ACT写作考试3种论证方法介绍.docxVIP

Word文档下载后（可任意编辑） 第 第 PAGE 1 页 共 NUMPAGES 1 页 ACT写作考试3种论证方法介绍  ACT考试技巧：ACT写作考试3种论证方法介绍  ACT考试经典名师课堂  1. 因果论证  因果论证是比较常见也是大多数同学使用较多的论证方法，但是通常情况下写出的因果论证并不深入。对于多重原因的事物，如果只停留在其中的某个层面上，把它当成最终因素，论点就可能不深刻，也难以把问题说透。这样的因果论证，其说服力是有限的。  这种情况，应当一层一层地追究下去，一直到找出最终极的原因为止。一般来说，越是表层的原因，越是为大家所熟知的，其论证力也就越有限;越深层的原因，就越能说明问题的实质，就越有说服力。以旧版本满分范文里面的一段话为例：  【例1】  The replacement of humans by machines leads to the loss of value to human life, an effect that outweighs the material gains of automation. The search to find human tasks that can be performed by machines inevitably leads to comparisons between the human and the machine. If a company executive wants to see if a inventory management team can be replaced by a robotic system, he will compare the two and determine which can do a better job. When this occurs, the people on the team are evaluated not for their worth as human beings, but for their effectiveness at performing a specific function—in essence, as we would evaluate a machine. In a larger sense, when we begin to think about humans in this way, the worth of a person’s life becomes dependent on only what they can do and no longer has any intrinsic value. As Perspective One states, we begin to lose our humanity. This new mindset and way of evaluating people, though seemingly harmless in the workplace, is devastating when it begins to pervade a society. If a person is judged only on his or her capability, there is no reason for a person to remain after they have served their function. This would warrant genocide against the elderly and the disabled because their burden on society would not be made up for by any production. Although the machines may seem to only fulfill the low skill jobs at the moment, there is no barrier to prevent the machines from replacing more. As the machines increase in intelligence, they will replace any tasks done by humans and render us unnecessary and worthless.  这个段落的主题句是The replacement of humans by machines leads