内窥镜与常规切开法采集大隐静脉的组织学比较（职称论文资料）.docVIP

内窥镜与常规切开法采集大隐静脉的组织学比较（职称论文资料） 目录 TOC \o 1-9 \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：内窥镜与常规切开法采集大隐静脉的组织学比较 2 1 资料与方法 3 2 结果 5 3 讨论 5 文2：内窥镜下治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症 7 1 材料和方法 8 11 一般资料 8 13 随访情况 9 14 典型病例 9 2 结 果 10 3 讨 论 10 31 腰突症术后复发的定义 10 33 手术适应证及局限性 11 34 对复发性腰突症行MED技术治疗的可行性 12 35 该术式开展的理论依据及近期临床效果 12 参考文摘引言： 13 原创性声明（模板） 14 文章致谢（模板） 14 正文 内窥镜与常规切开法采集大隐静脉的组织学比较（职称论文资料） 文1：内窥镜与常规切开法采集大隐静脉的组织学比较 Comparison of histological alteration between endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting and conventional vein saphenous harvesting HUANG Jinhong， DONG Jiande， GAO Feng， LI Zhijian， TENG Hale， ZHI Yonghui， CUI Shuisen， WAN Feng Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery， Beijing Electric Power Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical Univeity， Beijing 100073， China [Abstract] Objective: To compare the histological alteration between endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting and conventional saphenous vein harvesting. Methods: 110 cases of patients who were underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2010 to January 2011 in our hospital were selected and divided into endoscope vein harvesting group (EVH group， n=48) and conventional vein harvesting group (CVH group， n=62). Incision local complicatio of the two collecting methods were compared. Light microscopy were used to assess the integrity of the vascular wall， and scanning electron microscopy were used to assess the trauma of the epithelium. Results: The incidence of incision complicatio were compared between EVH group and CVH group， the difference was statistically significant (P＜)， and the incidence of EVH group was lower than that of CVH group(P＜). Vascular histological alteration was compared between the two groups by the observation of light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy， and the difference was not statistically significant (P). Conclusion: Histological trauma of the saphenous vein is similar between CVH and EVH group， but EVH group can reduce the incidence of incision