三种方法治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的疗效分析的中期报告.docxVIP

三种方法治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的疗效分析的中期报告 摘要： 目的：比较三种不同的治疗方法在治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折中的疗效。 方法：在2018年1月至2019年12月期间，我们招募了100名桡骨远端关节内骨折患者，按照随机方法分为三组，其中一组接受手术治疗，第二组接受保守治疗，第三组接受牵引治疗。在治疗完成后的6个月后进行随访，并记录患者疼痛、手部功能等指标。 结果：在随访的100名患者中，手术组的手部功能恢复最快，术后2个月良好，其次是保守组，最后是牵引组。在手疼痛、生活质量、疾病复发等指标方面，手术组和保守组无显著差异，但是与牵引组呈现显著差异。 结论：在中期总结中，手术治疗是治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的首选方法，保守治疗和牵引治疗可以考虑在特定的情况下使用。但是，这些结论仅仅是中期报告，还需要更长时间的随访和研究，来更好地评估不同治疗方法的长期疗效。 关键词：桡骨远端关节内骨折，手术治疗，保守治疗，牵引治疗，疗效比较。 Abstract: Objective: To compare the effect of three different treatment methods in the treatment of distal radius intra-articular fractures. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2019, we recruited 100 patients with distal radius intra-articular fractures, who were randomly assigned to three groups: one group underwent surgical treatment, the second group received conservative treatment, and the third group received traction treatment. After 6 months of treatment, the patients were followed up, and the indicators of pain and hand function were recorded. Results: Among the 100 patients in the follow-up, the surgical group had the fastest recovery of hand function, which was good after 2 months, followed by the conservative group, and finally the traction group. There was no significant difference between the surgical and conservative groups in terms of hand pain, quality of life, and disease recurrence, but there was a significant difference compared to the traction group. Conclusion: In the midterm summary, surgical treatment is the preferred method for treating distal radius intra-articular fractures, and conservative treatment and traction treatment can be considered in specific cases. However, these conclusions are only midterm reports, and longer follow-up and research are needed to better evaluate the long-term efficacy of different treatment methods. Keywords: distal radius intra-articular fracture, surgical treatment, conservative treatment, traction treatment, comparative efficacy.