gmat阅读比较分析类十课时.pptxVIP

GMAT–RC比较分析类1AmyHou

比较分析文章特征OG上比较分析文章范例文章精讲

两个对象呈现（文章开始处）→比较分析→作者的态度评价E.g.Twoworkspublishedin1984demonstratecontrastingapproachestowritingthehistoryofUnitedStateswomen.BuelandBuel’sbiographyofMaryFish(1736-1818)makeslittleeffortto...Lebsock,meanwhile,attemptsnotonlyto...butalsoto...一、现象解释文章特征

LineInWintersv.UnitedStates(1908),theSupreme

Courtheldthattherighttousewatersflowingthrough

oradjacenttotheFortBelknapIndianReservation

wasreservedtoAmericanIndiansbythetreaty(5)establishingthereservation.Althoughthistreatydid

notmentionwaterrights,theCourtruledthatthe

federalgovernment,whenitcreatedthereservation,

intendedtodealfairlywithAmericanIndiansby

reservingforthemthewaterswithoutwhichtheir(10)landswouldhavebeenuseless.Laterdecisions,citing

Winters,establishedthatcourtscanfindfederalrights

toreservewaterforparticularpurposesif(1)theland

inquestionlieswithinanenclaveunderexclusive

federaljurisdiction,(2)thelandhasbeenformally(15)withdrawnfromfederalpubliclands—i.e.,withdrawn

fromthestockoffederallandsavailableforprivate

useunderfederallanduselaws—andsetasideor

reserved,and(3)thecircumstancesrevealthe

governmentintendedtoreservewateraswellasland(20)whenestablishingthereservation.SomeAmericanIndiantribeshavealsoestablishedwaterrightsthroughthecourtsbasedontheir

traditionaldiversionanduseofcertainwaterspriorto

theUnitedStatesacquisitionofsovereignty.ForOG第10篇

(25)example,theRioGrandepueblosalreadyexistedwhen

theUnitedStatesacquiredsovereigntyoverNew

Mexicoin1848.Althoughtheyatthattimebecame

partoftheUnitedStates,thepueblolandsnever

formallyconstitutedapartoffederalpubliclands;in(30)anyevent,notreaty,statute,orexecutiveorderhas

everdesignatedorwithdrawnthepueblosfrompublic

landsasAmerica