纸质书和电子书辩论自由辩部分.pdf

电子书主要论据

1、获取资源的过程方便快捷，容量大，资源丰富。

theabundantresourceguaranteeaconvenientaccesstogettheright

resourcewewerightneed.Comparingwithtraditionalbooks,ebooks

downloadanduploadinformationonlinethatmakeiteasiereasiertofind

currenttimeinformation.

2、节省资源，保护森林：

ebookscansavemoneyandprotectforest.ebookscandramatically

reducetheconsumeofpaperandpreventwastingresource.Soweholdthe

viewthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.

3、节省空间，便于携带。

Ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespace.Comparingwith

heavypaperbooks,ebookscanbereadeverywhereandanytime，andyou

won’tbetired.

4、更加时尚个性化。

Ebooksarearefashionableandpersonalizedpersonalized.It’spopularpopulartoread

ebooks,withcellphone,pocketcomputerorMP5,maybeonthebus,inthe

office.Wecansetbackgroundandmodeonthesoftwareforreading.

Sowearefirmlybelievedthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.

一辨

Honorablejudges,distinguishedguests,ladiesandgentlemen,Iamgladto

1/6

books.+定义，限制在20词内

Hereareourmainreasons:Firstly,ebookshaveabundantresourceandit

isconvenienttotosearch.Secondly,ebooksebookscansavemoneyandprotect

forest.ebooksebookscancanreducetheuseofpaper,avoidthewasteof

resources.Thirdly,ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespace

Comparedwithheavypaperbooks,e-bookscanbereadatanytimeand

alifestyle.So,wearearefirmlybelievedthatthatebooksarebetterthanthanpaper

books.

自由辩：

性价比高

mobiledevice.Itdevice.Itisismuchmuchmorecheapercheaperthanpaperbooks.I’dliketoto

say,couldyouaffordalibrary?

对方回答并反问电子书不够普及，学生上课都用纸质书？

我方数据阐释。我方反问：纸质书难道不是对木材的浪费吗？

Imafraidyouarewrong.Accordingtothefourthreadinginvestigation

madebyChineseinstituteofpublishingpublishingscience,traditionalreadingrate

continuedtodeclineforsixyears,andtheamountofpeoplereading

ebooksis7.5timesmorethanbefore.

Anotherpointisthatthewastetoforest.Each