- 0
- 0
- 约8.57千字
- 约 3页
- 2025-06-26 发布于北京
- 举报
ExcerptfromEmotionalIntelligencebyDanielGoleman,parttwo,3.
CanEmotionsbeIntelligent?
Togetafullerunderstandingofjustwhatsuchtrainingmightbelike,wemustturnto
othertheoristswhoarefollowingGardner’sintellectuallead-mostnotablyaYale
psychologist,PeterSalovey,whohasmappedingreatdetailthewaysinwhichwecan
bringintelligencetoouremotions.Thisendeavorisnotnew;overtheyearseventhe
mostardenttheoristsofIQhaveoccasionallytriedtobringemotionswithinthe
domainofintelligence,ratherthanseeing“emotion”and“intelligence”asaninherent
contradictioninterms.Thus,E.L.Thorndike,aneminentpsychologistwhowasalso
influentialinpopularizingthenotionofIQinthe1920sand1930s,proposedina
Harper’sMagazinearticlethatoneaspectofemotionalintelligence,“social”
intelligence-theabilitytounderstandothersand“actwiselyinhumanrelations”–was
itselfanaspectofa’sIQ.Otherpsychologistsofthetikamorecynical
viewofsocialintelligence,seeingitintermsofskillsformanipulatingother
people-gettingthemtodowhatyouwant,whethertheywanttoornot.Butneitherof
theseformulationsofsocialintelligenceheldmuchswaywiththeoristsofIQ,andby
1960,aninfluentialtextbookonintelligencetestspronouncedsocialintelligenceasa
“useless”concept.
Butalintelligencewouldnotbeignored,mainlybecauseitmakesboth
intuitiveandcommonsense.Forexample,whenRoberSternberg,anotherYale
psychologistaskedpeopletodescribean“intelligent,”practicalpeopleskills
wereamongthemaintraitslisted.MoresystematicresearchbySternbergledhim
backtoThorndike’sconclusion:thatsocialintelligenceisbothdi
原创力文档

文档评论(0)