新GRE-Issue主题分类题库.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
新GRE-Issue主题分类题库.doc

新GRE-Issue主题分类题库 This page contains the Issue topics for the Analytical Writing section of the GRE? revised General Test. When you take the test, you will be presented with one Issue topic from this pool. Each Issue topic consists of an issue statement or statements followed by specific task instructions that tell you how to respond to the issue. The wording of some topics in the test might vary slightly from what is presented here. Also, because there may be multiple versions of some topics with similar or identical wording but with different task instructions, it is very important to read your test topic and its specific task directions carefully and respond to the wording as it appears in the actual test. 标注有*的题目为有官方范文的题目。 标注有2、3或4的题目为在官方题库中一字不差地重复2次、3次或4次的题目。 比较:36;因果:40;问解:30;结论:27。 原题版权属于ETS,本文档版权属成都新东方国外考试部。 A. 现在与将来(当务之急与百年大计)——9 1. Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 2 ——比较 2. Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. ——比较 3. Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 2 ——因果 4. Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. ——结论 5. (1) Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when peoples basic needs are not being met. ——因果 (2) Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. ——因果 6. Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application. Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档