网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

gmat AA七宗罪.doc

  1. 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
About AA 开头 1. using your own word to express the meaning of the item. 2. 转述题目中对该结论的support的理由 3. 指出改IDEA不有说服力。 1. The author concludes that....... This speaker claims that...... In this argument the author reaches the conclusion that. 2. The reasons offered to support this conclusion are that .....The ground for his evidence is that....... 3. This argument suffers from several critical problems .This line of reasoning is unconvincing for a couple of reasons. The reasoning of the argument is biased due to the inadequate and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion . 肚子 : 分论点的写法, 我觉得就是使劲不相信AUTHOR 我就是不和你一个调调 第一罪 无因果联系: 前后发生 , 不一定有因果联系 , AS WELL AS 同时发生的东东 Causal relationship ,causal connection , causal claim , causal explanation. The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification... The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B , the former event is responsibility for the latter . The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality .However , the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B. 二罪 样本不足 a short time 所得出的不能代表长期情况 一个例子不能得出普遍结论 representative, typical -----------exceptional atypical The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it . The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion. Unless it can be show that a is representative of all A . it is possible that... In fact , in face of such limited evidence , the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. The argument contributes a characteristic of an individual member of a group to the group as a whole. The author attempt to extract a general principle from a specific case,

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

yan698698 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档