1-平面图的线性荫度.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
1-平面图的线性荫度 张欣,刘桂真,吴建良 山东大学数学学院,济南  250100 摘要:如果一个图可以画在平面上使得其中的每条边被其他边交叉最多一次,则称该图是 1-平 面图。如果一个森林的每个分支都是路,则称该森林为线性森林。一个图 G 的线性荫度 la(G) 是 G 可以边分解为线性森林的最小个数。关于图的线性荫度,Akiyama, Exoo 与 Harary 猜想 ? ?(2G)? ≤ la(G) ≤ ? ?(G2)+1? 对每个图 G 都成立。本文证明了最大度 ? ≥ 33 的 1-平面图的线 性荫度恰好为 ??/2? 关键词:1-平面图,1-嵌入图,线性荫度 中图分类号: O157.5 On the linear arboricity of 1-planar graphs ZHANG Xin, LIU Guizhen, WU Jian-Liang School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100 Abstract: A graph is 1-planar if it can be drawn on a plane so that each edge is crossed by at most one other edge. A linear forest is a forest in which every connected component is a path. The linear arboricity la(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of linear forests in G, whose union is the set of all edges of G. Akiyama, Exoo and Harary conjectured that ? ?(2G)? ≤ la(G) ≤ ? ?(G2)+1? for any graph G. In this paper, we prove that the linear arboricity of every 1-planar graph with maximum degree ? ≥ 33 is exactly ??/2? Key words: 1-planar graph, 1-embedded graph, linear arboricity 0 Introduction All graphs considered here are ?nite, simple and undirected. Most of the notions are standard and we refer the readers to [1]. A linear forest is a forest in which every connected component is a path. The linear arboricity la(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of linear forests in G, whose union is the set of all edges of G. Akiyama, Exoo and Harary [2] conjectured that la(G) = ?(?(G) + 1)/2? for any regular graph G. It is obviously that la(G) ≥ ??(G)/2? for every graph G and la(G) ≥ ?(?(G) + 1)/2? for every regular graph G. So this conjecture is equivalent to the following conjecture. Conjecture 1. For any graph G, ? ?(2G)? ≤ la(G) ≤ ? ?(G2)+1?. Foundations: National Natural Science Foundation of China , Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (200804220001, 20100131120017), Graduate Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University (yzc10040), Chinese Ministry of Education Prize

文档评论(0)

文档分享 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档