避免硬着陆培训课件.pptVIP

April 2007 Avoiding Hard Landings - 15th Performance Operations conference Avoiding Hard Landings Content Hard Landings definition, detection, classification Avoiding Hard Landings Content Hard Landings definition, detection, classification Avoiding Hard Landings Definition of Hard Landing : Pilot’s point of view Pilots judge subjectively and comparatively the landings as being: Soft – Normal – Firm – Hard Subjectively = modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background Comparatively = In a relative manner; by comparison to something else “Hard landing suspected”: when the pilot decide that a structural examination is necessary Hard Landing information : Maintenance’s side Maintenance uses objective data to classify the landings Recorded vertical acceleration at aircraft CG Recorded vertical speed using Radio Altimeter data Load Report Classification of the landing by maintenance After a suspected hard landing: Classification of the landing using the Load Report Normal landing = no actions required Hard landing confirmed = perform inspection Severe Hard Landing confirmed = AOG contact Airbus Load Report not available = perform inspection Hard Landing confirmed: Maintenance inspection Inspection is divided in different phases Phase 1: general inspection for primary damage and indication of remote damage (mainly external) If damage = perform further inspection (phase 2) and required maintenance actions. If no damage = end of inspection No damage = Aircraft can temporarily return to service Grace period (e.g. 30 days or 100 - 200 cycles) Waiting for further elaborated analysis of the event by Airbus Required structural strength is maintained Risk is only stress corrosion (e.g. gear not achieving full life) Identification of Hard Landing Pilot: Subjective judgment Maintenance: Objective but incomplete data Maintenance system only covers straightforward hard landing events Rebounds, drift landing, landing with roll and high derotation