- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
超声清创对糖尿病足溃疡创面细菌清除及微循环作用的临床研究
1南方医科大学南方医院内分泌代谢科 2第三军医大学野战外科研究所
曹瑛1 薛耀明1 赖西南2 高方1 沈洁1 谢翠华1
摘要:目的 评价超声清创仪对糖尿病足溃疡创面细菌的清除作用及对微循环影响,探讨其可能的促愈机制。方法 采用随机对照法将2008年5月至2009年2月住院的糖尿病足患者24例随机分为标准治疗+普通冲洗组(简称标准治疗组)和标准治疗+超声清创组(简称超声清创组)各12例,分别对两组治疗20天内溃疡愈合速度、创面微循环改变及创面细菌清除作用的比较。结果1、超声清创组第20天平均创面愈合速率0.87±0.11,显著快于标准治疗组0.65±0.14(P0.05)。2、超声清创组治疗后创面平均血流灌注量0.91±0.18PU及经皮氧分压34.66±6.08显著高于标准治疗组的0.80 ±0.19和32.83±6.97(P均0.05)3、超声清创组治疗后创面细菌量显著少于标准治疗组(P0.05)。结论:超声清创术可通过减轻伤口细菌负荷及促进创面微循环而促进糖尿病足的伤口愈合。
关键词 超声清创 糖尿病足 细菌清除 微循环 愈合
Study on the mechanism of ultrasound debridement to promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcer
Caoying1, Xue yaoming1, Lai xinan2, Gaofang1, Shenjie1, Xiecuihua1. 1Department of Endocrinology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong. 510515, 2 Research Institute of Surgery ,Third Military Medical University
Abstract Object To evaluate the effect of ultrasound debridement apparatus in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer and study the probable mechanism of healing promotion.Methods 24 patients with diabetic foot ulcer, who hospitalized from May, 2008 to February, 2009, were randomized into standard therapy group and standard therapy plus ultrasound debridement group (ultrasound debridement group). There were 12 patients in each group. The speed of ulcer healing, microcirculation change of wound surface, bacterial on wound surface in 20 days were compared between the two groups. Results: 1, The average healing speed of wound surface on day 20 of ultrasound debridement group and standard therapy group were 0.87?.11and0s.65?6.14respectively,the former were significantly higer.(P0.05). 2, The average blood perfusion volume of wound surface and transcutaneous oxygen pressure of ultrasound debridement group were 0.91?.18PU and 34.66?.08 respectively, which significantly higher than those (0.80?.19PU,32.83?.97) of standard therapy group (P0.05).3, The bacterial counts on wound surface of u Resltrasound debridement group were significantly less than
文档评论(0)