国家竞争力：对不同国家类型和国家战略的影响外文翻译.docVIP

本科毕业论文外文翻译 外文题目：Nation Competitiveness :Implications for Different Groups and Strategies 出 处：Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness,2005 作 者：Dong-Sung Cho and Hwy-Chang Moon 原文 Abstract Several reports on national competitiveness already exists, but they are not satisfactory. This paper corrects the problems of the existing reports and suggests new methodologies of explaining national competitiveness. When comparing national competitiveness, nations should be grouped with regard to similarities in terms of economic scale and structure. For this purpose, this paper introduces 3x3 typology of country groups in terms of the nation’s size and competitiveness. In addition, this paper applies the classical generic strategies to the national level. Combining these two analytical frameworks, this paper demonstrates several useful policy implications for different levels of national competitiveness. Keywords: National Competitiveness, Country Groups, Generic Strategies Theory The two reports have different views on the definition of competitiveness and their models have been evolving over years. The IMD first defines competitiveness as “the ability of a country to create added value and thus increase national wealth” (IMD, 1996, p. 42). This definition implies that GDP and productivity are proxies for competitiveness, but the IMD argues that competitiveness cannot be reduced to the mere notions of GDP and productivity (IMD, 1996, p. 42). In contrast, the WEF accepts GDP and/or productivity as proxies for competitiveness by defining competitiveness as “the ability of a national economy to achieve sustained high rates of economic growth, as measured by the annual change in gross domestic product per person” (WEF, 1996,p. 19).While their definitions of competitiveness are different, both institutes have chosen almost identical factors of competitiveness. First