鲁訔的《杜甫年谱》与《编注杜甫诗》兼及鲁訔编年系统的渊源和异同问题.pdfVIP

第 33 卷 第 2 期 广东海洋大学学报 Vol.33 No.2 2013 年 4 月 Journal of Guangdong Ocean University Apr. 2013 鲁訔的《杜甫年谱》与《编注杜甫诗》 ——兼及鲁訔编年系统的渊源和异同问题 聂巧平 （暨南大学文学院，广东广州 510632 ） 摘 要：鲁訔《杜甫年谱》与源于“鲁訔系统”的编年体杜集《百家注》和《草堂诗笺》蕴含了丰富的文献学信息， 由此可重新检讨学者对已佚的《编注杜甫诗》的编次情况与渊源流变的看法。同时，鲁编本的支流《百家注》和《草 堂诗笺》在编次上亦有异同和优劣之别。在了解二刊本的具体编次情况的基础上，学者可根据需要作合理取舍利用。 关键词：鲁《谱》；《百家注》和《草堂诗笺》；编次；异同 中图分类号：I207 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1673-9159 （2013 ）02-0044-04 Chronicles of DU FU and the Annotation of Dufu’ Poetry：On the Differences Evolution of the Series of Chronological Works by Lu Yin NIE Qiao-ping (The Institute of the Chinese Language literature, Jinan University , Guangzhou 510632 ,China) Abstract ：The works of Chronicles of DU FU by Lu Yin and the series of Chronological works - Baijia Zhu Caotang Shi Jian, contains a wealth of philological information. And from what inferred by them, scholars could reconsider the basic information about the lost works, the Annotation of Du Fu’ poetry. Although there is a highly consistency between the two, Baijia Zhu Caotang Shi Jian, in editing, the works Caotang Shi Jian, has more advantages over the works Baijia Zhu . By understanding the characteristics, the advantages and disadvantages between these two, scholars could make the best use of them when necessary. Key words: Chronicles; Baijia Zhu Caotang Shi Jian ; editing; difference 宋代鲁訔《杜甫年谱》一卷存世（以下简称鲁 基本情况。 《谱》），其《编注杜甫诗》十八卷，已佚。刊行于 关于鲁訔的生平及杜甫研究情况，已有学者作 南宋孝宗朝的《王状元集百家注编年杜陵诗史》三