我国房地权利分离处分规则研究.pdfVIP

暨南大学硕士论文 我国房地权利分离处分规则研究 摘要 自上世纪90 年代，房地一体原则被确立为房地权利处分立法的基本原则。 它强制规定了房屋所有权和土地使用权的处分一体化，具有减少纠纷、便利司法 操作的作用。但由于历史条件限制、对意思自治重视不足以及研究方法偏差，房 地一体原则在社会实践中产生各种消极影响，引起学界热烈讨论。为合理设置房 屋所有权和土地使用权处分规则，本文设想房地权利具有分离处分的可能，并以 “权利客体关系和权利关系决定权利处分关系”为研究思路，以房地权利分离处 分的法理分析为基础，以设计房地权利分离处分规则为目的展开研究。通过比较 分析一元主义和二元主义，本文认为房屋和土地互为独立物并且不构成主从物关 系；在房地权利关系上，房地权利主从关系说、房地权利吸附说、效率价值说均 从反面揭示了房屋所有权和土地使用权的分离处分具有必要性、可行性和正当 性。作为房地一体原则的限制，房地权利分离处分规则应设置为“当事人书面明 示约定房地权利分离转让的，可以通过设立租赁权实现房地权利分离转让，房屋 买受人转让房屋所有权的，土地买受人享有优先购买权。若无约定，则推定建筑 物所有权与土地使用权保持处分一致。”最后，本文将房地权利分离处分规则适 用于农村小产权房合法化问题，通过为农村小产权房提供合法化的理论基础以及 合适的解决方案，验证房地权利分离处分规则的可操作性。 关键词：房地权利分离处分规则 房地一体原则 农村小产权房 I 暨南大学硕士论文 我国房地权利分离处分规则研究 Abstract Since the 1990s, the principle of integration between house ownership and land-using right has been in use as fundamental principle in real estate market. It provides compulsorily that the conveyance between house ownership and land-using right should be carried out in the same way, with the function of reducing dispute and facilitating judicial operation. But because of historical limits, disrega rd of autonomy of will and incorrect research methods, the principle see its own defects in the social practice and heated arguments among scholars have been triggered. To set up reasonable rule on house ownership and land-using right, this article based on jurisprudence analysis assumes the possibility of separate conveyance between house ownership and land-using right under the thought that legal relationship between objects and that between rights determine the conveyance rule. Through comparative analys is between unitary doctrine