- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
外文翻译
原文
Economic Evidence in Antitrust: Defining Markets and Measuring Market Power
Material Source:Library Author: Jonathan B. Baker Timothy F. Bresnahan
Identifying and Measuring Market Power.
Market power–the ability of firms to raise price above the competitive level for a sustained period–is a part of the legal framework in multiple antitrust contexts. Monopoly power is an element of the monopolization offense under Sherman Act §2. In addition,market power is often frequently assessed under Sherman Act §1,to determine whether conduct undertaken pursuant to an agreement was reasonable. The market power inquiry may apply to a firm individually or to a number of firms as a group.Historically,in the antitrust world,market power has most commonly been identified through inference from a high market share.But direct evidence has increasingly become important as analternative,in part because academic economists have developed a number of econometric approaches for measuring market power.
It is worth emphasizing that the ultimate economic question in antitrust litigation is almost never whether a firm or set of firms have market power.The case almost invariably concerns an economic objection to the challenged conduct–an agreement among rivals,amerger,exclusionary tactics and the like–that turns on whether the conduct has increased(in a retrospective case)or is likely to increase(in a prospective case)market power.Accordingly,the economic question is not the level of market power but the change.Antitrust law at times relies upon presumptions that if the level of market power is high,various types of conduct will increase it,and if the level of market power is low,they will not.That is,in legal terms,anticompetitive effect is at times inferred from proof of market power.Whether or not such inferences are justified empirically,they shift attention from the ultimate economic question of whether market power has increased.Our discussion of identification when measuring mar
文档评论(0)