不同根管清洗方法清洁效果的电镜观察.pdfVIP

首都民科大学学报 2007 年 12 月 Dec. 2007 第 28 卷第6 期 Journal of Capital Medical University Vo l. 28 No.6 临床研:先 不同根管清洗方法清洁效果的扫描电镜观察 徐爱凤张琛侯本祥 (首都医科大学附属北京门腔医院5于体牙髓科) [摘要] 目的 比较3 种不问根管清洗方法的根管清洁放果。方法 30 颗离体单根管牙应用逐步后退法进行根管扩大，采用3 种根管清洗方法进行根管清洁。分为超声清洗纽(A 组) ，传统注射器冲洗组(B 组)和根管棉捻擦洗组(C 组) ，每组 10 颗牙。将 1 牙体沿颊舌向纵劈，应用扫描电镜对各细在根冠 113 ， 1 113 及尖 113 部位站污层清洗的效果进行观察。统计学分析比较各组根 管清洁的差异。结果 根冠 113:3 组间差异无统计学意义;根小 113 和尖 113: A 、 B 组均优于 C 细(P 0. 05) , A 组优于 B 纠 (P 0.05) 0 结论 超声根管清洗对根管站?亏后的清洗效果最好，根管棉捻擦洗清洗效果较差。 [关键词] 站污层;根管冲洗1f1]; 打描111 镜 [中圄分类号] R 78 1. 05 Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy of 3 Different Root Canal Irrigating Methods: A Scanning Electronic Microscopic Study Xu Aifeng , Zhang Chen , Hou Benxiang ( Department 0/ E毗donti叽 Beijing Stomat仇gical Hospital , Capital Medical University) [ABSTRACT] Objective To evaluate the cleaning efficacy of 3 different root canal irrigating methods with scanning electronic microscopy( SEM ). Methods Thirty extracted permanent teeth with single straight root canals were randomly divided into 3 groups. AII the root canals were conventionally accessed , pulp removed and instrumented with crown down instrumenting technique using Protaper NiTi files ( Densply , USA) and NaOCI (5. 251毛， 1 mL) was used to flush the canals before further instrumentation. The final step was done with 3 different canal cleaning methods. Group A: Ultrasonic irrigation by placing the ultrasonic file of the ultrasonic device for root canal therapy( Odontoson2M , Denmark) at the juncti