由“英特尔诉讼案”谈滥用市场支配地位独占交易行为.pdfVIP

由“英特尔诉讼案”谈滥用市场支配地位独占交易行为 摘 要 英特尔公司在全球范围内，引发了一系列的反垄断诉讼，被指控通 过提供销售回扣来限制竞争，并通过胁迫手段来企图垄断市场。诉讼的 聚焦点在于英特尔公司是否实施了反垄断法所禁止的垄断行为，对英特 尔公司的处罚是否合法合理。世界各国反垄断法所禁止的垄断行为基本 上就是经营者达成垄断协议、滥用市场支配地位、具有限制竞争效果的 经营者集中等三种类型。通过对滥用市场支配行为六种主要形式的研究， 可以发现英特尔公司最有可能涉及独占交易的行为；在此基础上，根据 合理原则，对独占交易的认定标准的进行分析，即首先须具备市场支配 地位，其次是实施了滥用市场支配地位独占交易的行为，实质上导致了 反竞争的结果。可以发现英特尔公司的一系列被控诉的行为符合滥用市 场支配地位独占交易行为的构成要件，具有限制潜在竞争发展、影响整 体产业发展、损害消费者合法权益等危害，必须予以规制。再对比我国 反垄断法的相关规定，提出个人对滥用市场支配地位独占交易行为的处 理建议，即完善规制范畴、加大处罚力度、增加执法透明度。 关键词：英特尔诉讼案，反垄断法，市场支配地位，独占交易 BY THE “INTEL LAWSUITS”ON THE ABSUE OF DOMINANT MARKET POSITION EXCLUSIVE DEALING ABSTRACT Intel, on a global scale, triggered a series of anti-trust litigation, is charged with providing sales rebates to restrict competition, and by coercive means to Monopolize the market. Focal point of the proceedings is whether the implementation of Intels monopolistic behavior prohibited by anti-trust law, and whether the penalty on the legality of the Intel Corporation is reasonable. The world monopoly behaviors prohibited by anti-trust law are essentially three types, which are monopoly operator to reach an agreement, abuse of dominant market position, with the effect of restricting competition, and concentration of business operators. Acts of abuse of market dominance by the six main forms of research, we find that Intels most exclusive transactions may involve acts; On this basis, under reasonable rule, on the exclusive standards of conduct transactions analysis found that the first should have dominant market position, followed by the implementation of the abuse of market dominance exclusive deal was actually led to anti-competitive results. Intel can be found to a series of acts complained of abuse of dominant market position, consistent with exclusive transactions, components, has limited the development of potential comp