代表人诉讼判决的扩张效力.pdfVIP

代表人诉讼判决的扩张效力    摘 要    随着社会经济的发展，大量的群体性纠纷案件不断出现。由于现 实的需要，群体诉讼作为一种新型的诉讼制度越来越引起人们的关 注。而我国的群体诉讼制度，代表人诉讼制度的适用现状并不尽如人 意，其原因主要在于在立法层面上，我国代表人诉讼制度在民事诉讼 法中规定得过于原则，法律条文太少，可操作性比较差；在司法实践 层面上，代表人诉讼也遇到了运行难题，从所谓的“稳定社会不安定 因素”方面考虑，法院对代表人诉讼案件大多不予受理。本文主要运 用比较分析法和实证分析法，在考察外国几种群体诉讼制度类型的基 础上，结合我国自身的国情与实际，提出改革与完善我国代表人诉讼 制度的设想。本文首先通过概念类比的方式对代表人诉讼判决的定义 进行了阐述，引入正当程序原理对代表人诉讼判决的扩张问题进行了 宪法层面和诉讼法层面上的分析；其次用比较研究的方法从判决的确 定及适用等角度对各国的群体诉讼模式进行了比较分析；再次是用民 诉法上的确定当事人及既判力扩张理论论证了代表人诉讼判决扩张 的理论基础；最后是用实证研究和规范分析的方法，对我国现行的代 表人诉讼判决的扩张效力进行了评析，并就其如何在中国的现实环境 中得到进一步的完善，提出了可行性的建议。 关键词：代表人诉讼判决，正当程序，集团诉讼，当事人   IV    THE VALID EXPANSION OF REPRESENTATIVE ACTION’S JUDGMENT ABSTRACT This paper analyzed with the social and economic development, lots of group conflicts are taking place. Because of practical necessity, group litigation as a new litigation is more and more given attention. But the status quo of the group litigation in china, the representative action is unsatisfied. I conclude the reasons as follows. On the legislative side, most rules are abstract, and lack of applicability; on the judicial side, the application of representative action has many problems in practice. For example, for the social stability, most cases are refused by court. This paper with comparative and positive methodology, at the basic of reviewing several types of the group litigation system in foreign countries, combining with the condition and reality in our country, puts forward some opinions of the reformation and modification of the representative action sys