论我国民商事案件速裁机制.pdfVIP

摘 要 世纪之初，“公正与效率”的主题再次重申，速裁制度的设立有其特有的顺应社 会发展的司法程序价值。 速裁，是我国法院在司法实践中独创的一种审判方式。然而，其缺乏法律依据， 未形成地域间统一通用体系，这些都成为速裁机制进一步发展的障碍。 因此，透彻研究速裁机制的实践特点和实施效果，全面分析速裁机制在发展中 所面临的主要障碍，是我们充分利用速裁机制的独特效用完善的便民诉讼体系的必 经之路。 就笔者搜集的资料显示，最早涉及到速裁机制相关理论的论文为范愉的《小额 诉讼程序研究》，其文研究了小额诉讼程序的价值、制度设计和运作中的原理，以 及实践效果和存在的问题，分析了在中国的特定条件下引进小额程序的必要性和可 行性。此后出现的一系列的相关学术论文主要集中在以下几个要点：速裁机制本身 的特点或实践现状，然而，这些针对素材机制的研究成果，在深度和广度上仍有进 一步拓展的必要，系统而全面地考察速裁机制的实践特点，及时地总结有关经验的 同时，深入分析速裁机制在民商事审判改革中的理论困境与实践障碍，并指出未来 的改革方向和具体制度的完善之策，于理论，于实践，都是非常必要的。 关键词：速裁机制 小额诉讼 公正与效率 Abstract At the beginning of century, “fairly with efficiency” the subject reiterated once more that fast cuts the system to set up has its unique complies with the social development the judicial process value. Fast cuts, is Our country Court one trial way which originally creates in the judicial practice. However, it lacks the legal basis, has not formed between the region to unify the general system, these become fast cut the barrier which the mechanism further develops. therefore, thoroughly studies fast cuts the mechanism the practice characteristic and the implementation effect, the overall analysis fast cuts the mechanism the chief obstacle which faces in the development, is we use fully fast cuts the mechanism the unique effectiveness perfect convenient lawsuit systems road which must be taken. The material which collects on the author demonstrated that involves most early to fast cuts the mechanism correlation theories the paper for Fan cheerful Jot Legal procedure Research 1, its article has studied in the jot legal procedure value, the system design and the operation principle, as well as the practice effect and the existence question, analyzed has introduced the jot procedure under Chinas special condition the