论我国反垄断法目标选择-毕业论文.doc

论我国反垄断法的目标选择 摘要 本文主要探讨反垄断法的目标问题。反垄断法是用来保护竞争的法 律。但保护竞争并非终极目的，当人们对竞争有不同的理解时，所设定 的反垄断法目标也就不同。在西方思想传统中，保护竞争的观念发端于 保护自由的观念。理解自由主义对认识反垄断法的目标设定有着重要的 意义。 我国《反垄断法》第一条规定了立法目的，其中，公平不是我国反 垄断目标之一，“维护公平竞争”一语仅具有统摄全局的意义。垄断会 引起效率的损失，效率是我国反垄断法的目标之一。《反垄断法》中规 定了“维护消费者利益”，但明确把消费者利益保护作为反垄断法立法 目的是不妥当的。《反垄断法》第一条中并没有保护经济自由的提法， 但保护经济自由应当是反垄断法的题中之义。以公共利益为目标来实施 反垄断法要尤其小心，如果能够用其它政策工具来代替的话就应当使用 其它工具，以免造成新的扭曲。 当效率和经济自由两者相互冲突的时候，是选择经济自由还是效率 优先就是一个值得考虑的问题了。采用效率标准有一定的缺陷。而使用 经济自由的目标既契合我国反垄断法的立法体例，也符合我国当前的国 情。 关键词：反垄断法、目标、效率、经济自由 THE END OF ANTITRUST LAW ABSTRACT This article wants to discuss the purpose of the antitrust law. The antitrust law is the law which uses to protect competition. But protect competition is not the ultimate purpose, when people have different understandings to the competition; the end of the antitrust law is different. In Western thought tradition, the idea of protects competition come from the idea of protect freedom. Understood liberalism is the key to understand antitrust law. The first cause of China’s antitrust law had stipulated the purpose of legislation. “Fair play” is not one of the ends of antitrust law; “maintain fair play” is only a pronouncement. The monopoly can cause the efficiency loss; the efficiency is one of the ends of antitrust law. The antitrust law had stipulated “maintains the consumer benefit”, but it is inappropriate to make the consumer benefit protection as the end. The antitrust law has not mention to protect the economic freedom, but economic freedom is still one of the ends. Take the public interest as the goal must be carefully; if we can use other policy tools, nerve use competition policy. When efficiency and economic freedom have a conflict, we have to choose one. The efficiency standard has some flaws. But uses the economic freedom not only agrees with our country antitrust law legislation style, but also conform to our country current national condition. KEY WORDS: antitrust law, end, efficiency, economic freedom 上海交通大学 学位论文原创性声明 本人郑重声