AP Physics Comparability Study.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
AP Physics Comparability Study.ppt

Helps set cut points for AP grades College students’ responses scored as AP students’ would be ETS statisticians analyze the data, to see how college grades of A, B etc, compare to AP grades of 5, 4, etc. AP grades are adjusted as appropriate, based on data and judgment of Chief Reader. Behind that judgment are curriculum surveys used to set course outline and exam specs, input of committee as exam questions are developed, and information about student performance from the Reading leadership. Goal is that 4/5 cut is at college mid-A’s, 3/4 cut at mid-B’s etc. Provides some information to colleges that relates their students’ performance to the AP students and other participating colleges College instructors receive data that allows them to compare their students as a group to the AP population and the total group of college students participating. Invitations sent to colleges and universities receiving 20 or more AP Physics B 2006 exam grades Letter sent to department chairs, college AP Physics Readers and present/past Development Committee members Instructors gave tests at appropriate time near the end of their semester courses Not all colleges gave every study test Physics B first semester had 11 colleges, Physics B second semester had 4 (all these also gave first semester) Physics C Mechanics and EM each had 8 Desire 20 colleges minimum – since study was added late in summer, many colleges couldn’t work it into their schedules 2007 exam analysis done as usual, using standard equating performed each year, yielding cut scores based on carryover of same score scale Data from colleges analyzed – through method similar to regular equating, a set of “new” cut scores for 2006 generated based on college standards Chief Reader, ETS staff, and CB staff review individual college data to identify any “suspect” data, e.g. Students not motivated Test content not good match to course content Low correlation between student course grade and stud

文档评论(0)

gshshxx + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档