浅论民事诉讼自认的效力.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
摘要 自认的效力是指在民事诉讼过程中,经当事人承认的于己不利的事实,无需对方当事 人举证,也无需法院依职权调查其真实性就能对当事人和法院产生拘束力,限制争执及举 证的范围。承认自认的效力是自认人自由意志、充分表达自己意愿和自由处分自己权利的 体现,有助于弱化法官职权,强化当事人主体地位,促进我国民事诉讼模式由职权主义向 当事人主义转变;也有利于简化诉讼程序,提高诉讼效率,充分利用有限的司法资源。但 依据现有法律运用自认效力规则会产生一系列问题,需对相关规则进行完善。民事诉讼过 程中,由于自认在法定情形下可以被撤销的,会导致笔录前后不一致,因此,可以对当事 人自认事实单独制成笔录,将它与一般的庭审笔录区分开来。最高人民法院《证据规定》 第八条第四款、第七十四条对自认撤销的规定存在不一致,这会导致适用法律的不确定性, 容易引起混乱,需要立法统一其规定。我国更倾向职权主义模式的民事诉讼模式影响自认 效力的发挥,而当事人主义模式是自认规则存在的理想环境,所以要从根本上转变诉讼模 式。 关键词:民事诉讼  自认  效力  I Abstract The effectiveness of self-admission in the lawsuit is a party who accepts its reality when the other party advocates facts,without the proof of the other party and also without investigating the reality of fact that the court with the authority, the self-admission has sanction to the party and court and limit the scope of the dispute and the burden of proof.Admitting the effectiveness of self-admission is identity of free will, fully express their will and freely dispose their right,help to weaken the judge authority, strengthen the principal position of the parties,to promote our country civil litigation pattern from the functions and powers doctrine to the adversary;and it is helpful to simplify the procedure, improve the efficiency of litigation, make full use of the limited judicial resources.But according to the existing law, using the avowed rules will produce a series of problems, we need to perfect the rules. When self-admission is in legal cases it can be withdrawn in the process of Civil litigation, it lead to record inconsistent.so we can make the record separately for the fact that the parties acknowledged,Distinguish it with the general trial record.The supreme peoples court in the fourth paragraph of article 8 of provisions on evidence, the existence of the provisions of article seventy-four of the acknowledgment to revoke is consistent,it can lead to the uncertainty of the application of law, easy to cause confusion, unified the rules need to legislation.More functions and powers

文档评论(0)

zxli + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档