从论元角度看_王冕死了父亲_.pdfVIP

2003 年5 月 外语教学 M ay. 2003 第24 卷　第3 期 For eig n Lang uage Ed ucation Vol.24 No. 3 马　莉 ( 北京外国语大学 英语系 北京 100089) :传统语法一般将实词性动词分为两大类: 及物动词, 不及物动词。凡须直接带宾语的动词是及物动词, 凡不能 直接带宾语的动词是不及物动词。然而 一个较特殊的句子 “王冕死了父亲”, 曾经引起广泛的关注。以往的文献中已 经 了不少讨论, 的确给我们提供了很多思考问题的角度,但似乎都对 “死”为什么会 这样的用法避而不谈。简单地 将 “死”定义为一元动词,说服力不是很强。为什么不及物动词 “死”会 这种用法呢? 本文运用 关论元的理论对 “死” 及一系列的动词进行分析, 提出这类动词除了一元动词的意义和用法外,还 二元动词的意义和用法。 :论元; 述谓;论旨角色; 配价 : 314: : 1000-5544(2003)03-0023-05 H A Abstract: T raditionally, notional verbs are divided into t o categories: transitive verbs and intransitive verbs. Verbs, hich can take a direct object, are called transitive verb; those, hich can not take a direct object , are called intransitive verb. A special Chinese sentence- - in hich the intransitive verb (die) takes a di- rect object has long been the focus of attention Previous studies relevant to this sentence have provided us ith vari-, . ous points of vie , ho ever almost all the studies evade exploring the reason of such a phenomenon It is not very, . convincing to simply claim that is a one-argument verb. This paper employs the theory of argument to analyze and a series of verbs in Chinese, and dra s the conclusion that in addition to the meaning and usage of one-argu- ment verbs, this series of verbs also have the meaning and usage of t o-argument verbs. : ; ; - ; Key words argument predicate Hrole valence , 0. ( , 1993) ,( , 1998) , ( , 1998) , ( , 1999) , ( , 2000) , , ( ,2000) , ( ,2001) , ,