《International trade and labor–demand elasticities》.pdf

Journal of International Economics 54 (2001) 27–56 www.elsevier.nl/locate/econbase International trade and labor–demand elasticities Matthew J. Slaughter* Department of Economics, Dartmouth College and NBER, 309 Rockefeller Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA Received 17 September 1998; received in revised form 25 February 1999; accepted 30 March 1999 Abstract In this paper I try to determine whether international trade has been increasing the own-price elasticity of demand for U.S. labor in recent decades. The empirical work yields three main results. First, from 1961 through 1991 demand for U.S. production labor became more elastic in manufacturing overall and in five of eight industries within manufacturing. Second, during this time U.S. nonproduction-labor demand did not become more elastic in manufacturing overall or in any of the eight industries within manufacturing. If anything, demand seems to be growing less elastic over time. Third, the hypothesis that trade contributed to increased elasticities has mixed support, at best. For production labor many trade-related variables have the predicted effect for specifications with only industry controls, but these predicted effects disappear when time controls are included as well. For nonproduction labor things are somewhat better, but time continues to be a very strong predictor of elasticity patterns. Thus the time series of labor–demand elasticities are explained largely by a residual, time itself. This result parallels the common finding in studies of rising wage inequality. Just as there seems to be a large unexplained residual for c