托管代码与非托管代码效率的对比.docxVIP

 HYPERLINK /wuchang/archive/2006/12/07/584997.html 托管代码和非托管代码效率的对比。 2006-12-07 10:14 by 无常, 12026 visits,? HYPERLINK /wuchang/archive/2006/12/07/584997.html 收藏,? HYPERLINK /wuchang/admin/EditPosts.aspx?postid=584997 编辑 ?一直以来只知道托管代码的效率要比非托管代码低，至于低多少也没有可参考的数据。今天在 HYPERLINK / \t _blank csdn看到的 HYPERLINK / \t _blank 英特尔多核平台编程优化大赛的广告，把里面的代码下载回来，分别用非托管c/托管cpp/c#做了个简略的性能测试，不比不知道，一比吓了一跳。且看数据说话。 ? 第一步：原始代码如： /*?compute?the?potential?energy?of?a?collection?of?*//*?particles?interacting?via?pairwise?potential????*/?#include?stdio.h#include?stdlib.h#include?math.h#include?windows.h#include?time.h?#define?NPARTS?1000#define?NITER?201#define?DIMS?3?int?rand(?void?);int?computePot(void);void?initPositions(void);void?updatePositions(void);?double?r[DIMS][NPARTS];double?pot;double?distx,?disty,?distz,?dist;int?main()?{???int?i;???clock_t?start,?stop;???initPositions();???updatePositions();????start=clock();???for(?i=0;?iNITER;?i++?)?{??????pot?=?0.0;??????computePot();??????if?(i%10?==?0)?printf(%5d:?Potential:?%10.3f\n,?i,?pot);??????updatePositions();???}???stop=clock();???printf?(Seconds?=?%10.9f\n,(double)(stop-start)/?CLOCKS_PER_SEC);???int?e;???scanf(%d,e);}??void?initPositions()?{???int?i,?j;????for(?i=0;?iDIMS;?i++?)??????for(?j=0;?jNPARTS;?j++?)??????????r[i][j]?=?0.5?+?(?(double)?rand()?/?(double)?RAND_MAX?);}??void?updatePositions()?{???int?i,?j;????for(?i=0;?iDIMS;?i++?)??????for(?j=0;?jNPARTS;?j++?)?????????r[i][j]?-=?0.5?+?(?(double)?rand()?/?(double)?RAND_MAX?);}??int?computePot()?{???int?i,?j;???for(?i=0;?iNPARTS;?i++?)?{??????for(?j=0;?ji-1;?j++?)?{????????distx?=?pow(?(r[0][j]?-?r[0][i]),?2?);????????disty?=?pow(?(r[1][j]?-?r[1][i]),?2?);????????distz?=?pow(?(r[2][j]?-?r[2][i]),?2?);????????dist?=?sqrt(?distx?+?disty?+?distz?);????????pot?+=?1.0?/?dist;??????}???}???return?0;} 执行结果如下： 执行时间4.609s。 ? ?第二步：托管 新建一个 C++ CLR Console Aplication，命名为mcpp。打开mcpp.cpp文件，将原始代码粘贴进来即可（代码太长这