不同桩道预备时机及其充填材料对根管微渗漏的影响.pdf

目录 1 不同桩道预备时机及充填材料对根管微渗漏响···················1 1.1 中文摘要·····················································································1 1.2 英文摘要····················································································· 1.3 前言····························································································· 1.4 材料与方法················································································· 1.5 结果····························································································· 1.6 讨论····························································································· 1.7 结论····························································································· 1.8 参考文献····················································································· 1.9 英汉缩略词对照表····································································· 2 致谢····························································································· 3 桩道预备对根管封闭性能的影响及根管微渗漏检测方法（综述） ····································································································· 不同桩道预备时机及充填材料对根管微渗漏的影响 摘 要 目的：本课题通过加压染料渗透法，比较即刻桩道预备和延迟桩 道预备对经不同材料充填的根管微渗漏的影响，旨在找到对根管微渗 漏较有利的桩道预备时机及充填材料，为临床的技术选择提供一定的 科学参考依据。方法：128 颗新鲜拔除的单根前磨牙，采用逐步后退 法预备，侧向加压法充填，根据不同桩道预备时机和充填糊剂对样本 按照配伍原则进行以下分组：A1 组，AH-plus 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，即 刻桩道预备（16 颗）；A2 组，pro-MTA 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，即刻桩道 预备（16 颗）；B1 组，AH-plus 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，延迟桩道预备（1 6 颗）；B2 组, pro-MTA 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，延迟桩道预备（16 颗）； C1 组，AH-plus 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，无桩道预备 （16 颗）；C2，pro- MTA 糊剂+牙胶尖充填，无桩道预备 （16 颗）；阴性对照组，AH-plu s 糊剂+牙胶尖充填 （16 颗）；阳性对照组，不使用糊剂，牙胶尖直接 充填 （16 颗）。桩道预备用3#peeso 钻完成，根管内保留5mm 充填材 料。C 组，阴性对照组和阳性对照组样本均只充填5mm，不做桩道 预备。将所有样本用氧化锌水门汀暂封，置于装有人工组织液的玻璃 杯内，贮于37°C 、100％湿度的恒温箱中4 周。经过5°C 及55°C 的 水中进行500 次冷热循环，将各组样本分为两小组，采用加压染料渗 透法，分别对各组进行冠向及根向的微渗漏检测。采用