论我国刑事立案监督存在问题对策.pdfVIP

摘 要 摘 要 修改后的刑事诉讼法赋予检察机关一项新的诉讼监督职能，即刑事立案监 督，此项职能是纠正司法实践中出现的有案不立，有罪不究，以罚代刑等执法不严、 司法不公的有力武器。但随着立案监督实践的深入，刑事立案监督在制度设计和实际操 作上的缺陷和不足日益凸显，监督的力度与效果难以达到制度应有的价值目标，在立法 上刑事立案监督指向对象过于狭窄，刑事立案监督方式单一，缺乏有效的制约手段，程 序规定不够完善；在司法实践中，案源少、监督空间有限，检察机关目前的机构设置也 不利于立案监督的有效实施。为此，我们有必要进一步完善刑事立案监督工作机制。 本文对刑事立案监督的对象、范围、机构以及具体实施中的一些常见问题进行了探 讨，对刑事立案监督工作中的几个经常遇到的问题进行了剖析，提出了如何完善刑事立 案监督制度的几点建议。在立法上，扩大立案监督的对象，规定有实际操作性和有效性 的惩罚措施，完善相应的监督程序；在司法实践中，我们应该加强宣传教育，调动一切 可以调动的力量来拓宽立案监督案源渠道，设置专门的立案监督部门，做到有案必办。 健全我国的刑事立案监督制度，有利于充分发挥检察机关在刑事立案阶段的监督职能， 使之能有效的维护法律尊严，有力的惩治犯罪，更好地实现公平正义。 关键词：刑事立案 监督 对策 I Abstract Abstract The revised Criminal Procedure provides a new supervision function of the Procuratorate, that is, this function is a powerful weapon to lessen the situation that are not justice and unfair such as cases not strictly filed, crimes not punished, fine instead of punishment and so on. However, with the further implementation of this function, flaws and shortcomings of this function are increasingly prominent. The supervision intensity and effectiveness is difficult to hit the target value. The range of stipulated object of criminal case supervision in legislation is too narrow, the mode single, lack of effective means of constraints, and the program is not perfect; In judicial practice, the sources of case is little, monitoring space is limited, the current institution can not match up to its function. Therefore, we need to perfect the criminal case supervision mechanism. Some common problems such as the object of this mechanism, the range, the institutions and the specific implementation of it and several problems often encountered were discussed in this article, some