Soil Organic Carbon Stocks as Affected by Tillage Systems in a Double-Cropped Rice Field-论文.pdf

下载文档 降价啦

2
0
约4.99万字
约 9页
2015-12-30 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Soil Organic Carbon Stocks as Affected by Tillage Systems in a Double-Cropped Rice Field-论文.pdf

1、本文档共9页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Pedosphere 23(5)：696—704，2013 ISSN 1002--0160／CN32--1315／P PED0SPHERE ⑥ 2013SoilScienceSocietyofChina Publishedby ElsevierB．V．and SciencePress www elseviercom ／locate／pedosphere SoilOrganicCarbon StocksasAffectedby TillageSystems in aDouble—Cropped RiceField xuShang—Qi，，ZHANGMing—Yuan，，ZHANGHai—Lin，，，CHENFu，，YANGGuang—Li。 andXIAO Xiao—Ping。 CollegeofAgronomyandBiotechnology，ChinaAgriculturalUniversity，Beijing100193(China) 。KeyLaboratoryofFarmingSystem，MinistryofAgricultureofChina，Beijing100193(Chin 。SoilandFertilizerInstituteofHunanProvince，Changsha410125(China) (ReceivedJanuary25，2013；revisedJuly2，2013) ABSTRACT Tillagepracticescanpotentiallyaffectsoi1organiccarbon (SOC)accumulationinagriculturalsoils．A 4一yearexperimentwas conductedtoidentifytheinfluenceoftillagepracticesonSOC sequestrationinadouble-croppedrice(OryzasativaL．)fieldinHunan ProvinceofChina．Threetillagetreatments，no-till(NT)，conventionalplowtillage(PT)，androtarytillage(RT)，werelaidina randomized completeblockdesign．ConcentrationsofSOC andbulk density (BD)ofthe0-80cm soillayerweremeasured，and SoCstocksofthe0～20and0—80cm soillayerswerecalculatedonanequivalentsoilmass(ESM)basisandfixeddepth (FD)basis． Soilcarbonbudget(SCB)underdifierenttillagesystemswereassessedonthebasisofemissionsofmethane(CH4)andCO2and theamountofcarbon (C)removedbythericeharvest．Afterfouryearsofexperiment，theNTtreatmentsequestratedmoreS0C thantheothertreatments．TheS0C stocksintheO一80cm layerunderNT (onanESM basis)was as highas 129．32MgCha- ， significantlyhigherthanthoseunderPT andRT fP 0．05)．TheorderofSOC stocksinthe0—80cm soillayerwasNT PT RT and thesameorderwasobserved forSCB：however in theO一20cm soillayer．theRT treatmenthad a higherSOC stock than the PT treatment．Therefore．whencomparingS0C stocks，onlyconsideringthetop 20am ofsoilwouldlea