关于检察机关起诉裁量权.pdfVIP

合，国际刑事司法的交流与合作，各国起诉裁量权的运作上出现了相 融趋势。 第三部分是我国起诉裁量权制度的反思与完善。我国起诉裁量权 制度存在很大的缺陷：一方面起诉裁量权适用的案件范围过窄，运行 方式单一，使起诉裁量权作用很小，不适用我国当前的刑事司法要求； 另一方面对起诉裁量权的制约也有待完善,不仅对起诉决定的制约有 待加强，而且对不起诉决定的制约也有待改善。鉴于此，建议从以下 方面对我国起诉裁量予以完善：第一，明确起诉裁量权的行使原则， 扩大其适用案件范围。第二，补充和完善起诉裁量的运行方式，包括 增设暂缓起诉的规定，赋予检察机关选择起诉的权力，确立我国的认 罪协商制度。第三，撤销我国的“公诉转自诉”制度，保证起诉裁量 权的确定力和拘束力。第四，完善我国起诉裁量权的制约机制,包括 加强起诉裁量权运作的透明度，完善上级检察机关的制约制度和强化 起诉裁量权的司法制约机制。 起诉裁量权作为一项重要的制度，将在刑事诉讼中发挥极其重要 的作用，必须对起诉裁量权的运作原理进行深入的研究和完善。值得 欣喜的是，我国起诉裁量权的改革得到了诉讼法学界的高度重视，我 国《刑事诉讼法》的修改也已经提上日程，这为我国起诉裁量权的完 善提供了很好的机遇。我们对此充满期待和信心！ 关键词：起诉裁量权 运行形式 制约机制 2 Abstract of the Thesis In recent years, the conflict between ascending amount of criminal cases and the limited justice source is significant with the development of human economic society. How to use better the limited justice source to handle criminalcases as many as possible is an urgent problem in modern criminal action. So the research in this problem is important. The core of this article is to promulgate the right operation mechanism of the prosecuting discretion. We want to elaborate that how to set up or perfect it in a nation can realize its maximum value and avoid its disadvantages in the meantime. We hope this research will contribute to the prosecuting discretion of our country. The thesis is, about 40,000 words, composed of three parts. The first part is the summary on the prosecuting discretion. It is a power that the public prosecutor decides whether to indict an offender or not according to the fact of the case and the demand of the law in the criminal procedure. The characters of it are validity, independency and discretion. It has various way to operate and has more than one effect in the law. The second part is the comparison of the prosecuting discretion