两种加辅助网络的全桥变换器的损耗对比分析.pdfVIP

第 32 卷 第 18 期 中 国 电 机 工 程 学 报 Vol.32 No.18 Jun. 25, 2012 66 2012 年 6 月 25 日 Proceedings of the CSEE ©2012 Chin.Soc.for Elec.Eng. 0258-8013 (2012) 18-0066-07 TM 46 A 470 40 文章编号： 中图分类号： 文献标志码： 学科分类号： ⋅ 两种加辅助网络的全桥变换器的损耗对比分析 陈仲，刘沙沙，史良辰，季锋 (江苏省新能源发电与电能变换重点实验室(南京航空航天大学) ，江苏省 南京市 210016) Power Loss Comparison of Two Full-bridge Converters With Auxiliary Networks CHEN Zhong, LIU Shasha, SHI Liangchen, JI Feng (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of New Energy Generation and Power Conversion (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics), Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu Province, China) ABSTRACT: By employing a passive auxiliary network 找降低损耗的方法，以进一步提高变换器的效率。 consisting of capacitors and inductors, the full-bridge converter 文献[7]对开关管导通损耗进行了定性的讨论，没有 can achieve zero voltage switching (ZVS) for all primary 进行定量的分析和计算。文献[8]推导出了传统全桥 switches in a wide load range. Meanwhile, accurate loss 变换器原边电流有效值的表达式，并给出了原边开 analysis facilitates the proposal of novel methods to reduce 关管和副边整流管导通损耗的计算公式，但是对于 losses, optimization of converter topology and improvement of the efficiency. In this paper, the detailed loss analysis of 电路中其他元件的损耗则没有给出具体的计算方 full-bridge converters with auxiliary networks was performed, 法。文献[9]给出了一种损耗分析方法，但是依然不 and a novel simplified loss analysis model was given. Based on 够完整，且部分损耗分析公式中参数较难选取，给 the proposed model, the losses of full-bridge converter with 实际的损耗计算带来了困难。文献[10]着重对超前 π-type auxiliary network and Y-type auxiliary network were 桥臂与滞后桥臂开关管的损耗进行比较，但对于磁 studied and compared in deep.