a randomized double-blind study evaluating anandron associated with orchiectomy in stage d prostate cancer:一项随机双盲研究评价尼鲁米特与d期前列腺癌去势相关.pdfVIP

a randomized double-blind study evaluating anandron associated with orchiectomy in stage d prostate cancer:一项随机双盲研究评价尼鲁米特与d期前列腺癌去势相关.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
a randomized double-blind study evaluating anandron associated with orchiectomy in stage d prostate cancer:一项随机双盲研究评价尼鲁米特与d期前列腺癌去势相关

J. SteroidBiochem. Molec. Biol. Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 909-915, 1990 0960-0760/90 $3.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved Copyright © 1990 Pergamon Press plc A R A N D O M I Z E D DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY E V A L U A T I N G A N A N D R O N ® ASSOCIATED WITH O R C H I E C T O M Y IN STAGE D PROSTATE C A N C E R M. NAMER, l * J. TOUBOL,2 A. CATY, 3 J. E. COUETTE,4 J. DOUChEZ, 5 P. KERBRAT6 and J. P. DROZ 7 ~CentreAntoine Lacassagne, 36, Voie Romaine,06054Nice Cedex,2H6pitalPasteur, 06002Nice Cedex, 3Centre Oscar Lambret, 59020 Lille Cedex, 4Centre Franqois Baclesse, 14021 Caen Cedex; 5Centre Claudius Regaud, 31052 Toulouse Cedex, 6CentreEug6ne Marquis, 35011 Rennes Cedex and 7Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 VillejuifCedex, France Summary--Arandomized double-blind study with a 3-yr follow-up comparing the two arms orchiectomy + Anandron (300 mg) vs orchiectomy + placebo in 125 patients with stage D prostate cancer has confirmed the beneficial effects of the combined Anandron ~ therapy on subjective parameters and on the best objective response (NPCP criteria), although these effects were not statistically significant, but failed to detect any improvement in time-to-disease progression or survival. Comparison with the results of other trials emphasizes the urgent need to establish suitable prognostic factors by further clinical research before evaluating the benefits of individual drugs. I N T R O D U C T I O N

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ajgoaw + 关注
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档