民事诉讼专家辅助人制度实证的研析.docVIP

 内容摘要 近年来，民事诉讼中的专业性案件越来越多，这些案件如果仅凭鉴定结论来盖棺定 论难免有失偏颇，而在司法实践中，法官对于涉及非法学专业的技术难题往往因自身知 识的不足，很难做出正确的判断，为了弥补这一缺陷，新《民事诉讼法》确立了“专家 辅助人制度”，使专家辅助人的存在获得了法律依据。但是，由于法律规定的过于简略， 以至于在民事诉讼司法实践中，出现了不能充分发挥专家辅助人的作用的问题，也违背 了立法设立该制度的初衷。本文以王明德诉北京东方新强设备有限公司一案为例，分析 专家辅助人制度的相关法理、现状等，提出完善的建议。 此论文正文共分为三个部分，全文 2.2 万余字。 第一部分“案件基本情况”，主要介绍了论文所分析案例的案由以及基本案情，阐 述了学术界对于该案件的分歧意见，进而总结出案件中的争论焦点。 第二部分“相关问题法理分析”，对现行法律法规关于专家辅助人制度的相关规定 进行梳理，从司法实践出发简述了该制度的现状，然后着重分析了专家辅助人制度所蕴 含的公平、效率、正义、公开、科学等法治理念。 第三部分“本案的分析与结论”，结合前文中的争议焦点对案例进行深入的分析， 进而得出本案的结论，从立法角度、司法角度等，提出自己对完善专家辅助人制度的建 议。首先应完善专家辅助人制度的法律法规，从制度层面上对专家辅助人的资格、参与 诉讼的程序、权利义务等方面做出明确的规定；其次在具体的司法实践中，对于专家辅 助人的诉讼地位、意见效力及可采性等几个方面要做到立法与司法相一致；最后还应完 善对专家辅助人制度的限制，加强约束和规范，防止滥用专家辅助人制度。 关键词：专家辅助人；资格；诉讼地位；诉讼程序；专家辅助人意见效力 I Abstract In recent years, civil litigation involving professional gets more difficult cases, these cases if the mere identification of the conclusions to draw a conclusion inevitably biased, and in judicial practice, judges involving illegal profession often due to technical problems lack of self-knowledge, it is difficult to make the right judgments; civil action to fully protect the rights of the parties to overcome the judges finding of over-reliance on expert conclusions weaknesses, Chinas new Civil Law established expert Assistant System so that experts assist people to obtain a legal basis exists. However, because the law is too simple, that in civil judicial practice, there has not fully play the role of the experts who assisted problems, but also contrary to the original intention of the legislation to set up the system. In this paper, Wang Mingde v. Beijing East Xinqiang Equipment Co. case , for example, demonstrated the experts who assisted the relevant legal and institutional status quo , analyzes the problems of the system , put forward a sound proposal. This thesis is divided into three parts the text, the text of 2.2 million words. The first part of case base case, the paper describes the analysis of the cause of action as well as the basic fact