论我国行政契约适用困境和救济.docVIP

所应当赋予行政主体一定特权，既然行政契约的内在已经决定了契约双方的权利 义务配置是不均衡的，那么应当尽量将这种不均衡控制在一个合理的范围内，杜 绝公权力的失范，损害合法的私权。并且本文不再仅单纯关注行政契约广泛适用 中公权力失范的可能性，同样也重视在市场经济体制中可能存在契约相对人出卖 公权力现象的规制。 第三部分：评述当前我国对于行政契约救济途径的现状。长期以来由于受到 民法与经济法理论的桎梏，我国行政契约救济制度建设存在诸多缺失，再加之我 国正处于社会转型期，相关行政管理体制的改革造成了原有的救济制度的取消， 所以我们有必要对现有行政契约的救济制度进行深刻反思与重构。 第四部分：通过对西方国家行政契约司法救济制度设计的比较与学习，我们 从中能汲取的最重要的启示就是将行政契约的救济不仅要重视司法内的救济，更 需要考量司法外救济制度的构建。基于大量立法文本与案例的分析探讨适合我国 国情的行政契约救济制度，主要围绕司法外以及司法内的救济进行阐述，确立行 政契约适用公法与私法并用的司法审查规则，基于行政契约双方都有违约的可 能，故在司法审查内容上也应各有侧重。 关键词：行政契约；依法行政；行政优益权；司法审查 2 Abstract Accompanied by the rapid economic development, social life increasingly complex and urgent transformation of government functions, administrative role is no longer limited to the traditional command and obedience administrative philosophy. A new administrative innovation model came into being. The rise of the administrative contract theory is the public authority to break through the traditional administrative law theory. However, compared to the West, our theoretical research is still far behind the process of practice. The current administrative contract management legislation or drafting a judicial interpretation more difficult for the reason, a very important reason is the lack of sufficient empirical basis. In order to fit the needs of the construction of the current government under the rule of law in China, aimed at the topic of this article attempts to clarify the administrative contract theory on the basis of focus from the practice the predicament and Remedy explore administrative contracts are widely applicable, by the large number of cases Empirical administrative contracts are widely applicable theory and institutional dilemma, analysis of the administrative contract risk prevention judicial relief material to provide for the effective control the public power abusiveness relief relative to the legitimate rights and interests of the legal rules. This article consists of two parts: introduction and the body of the content. The Introduction