侧倾文献报告.pptx

A Review of Vehicle Rollover Prevention ;Main Content;1.Background and Motivation;1.Background and Motivation;Of the?nearly 9.1 million?passenger car, SUV, pickup and van crashes in 2010, only?2.1%?involved a rollover. However, rollovers accounted for?nearly 35%?of all deaths from passenger vehicle crashes. In 2010 alone, more than 7,600 people died in rollover crashes.(From NHTSA safercar.gov);;2.Brief Introduction to Vehicle Rollover;;General Causes for Vehicle Rollover;Two Fundamental Problems in Vehicle Rollover Prevention ;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;SRT(Static Rollover Threshold) and SSF(Static Stability Factor) ;SSF(Static Rollover Factor) ;Comment: SRT and SRF are both suitable for the assessment of stead-state rollover, and they quite easy accepted and understood. However, most rollovers are dynamic motions, SRT and SRF can’t predict the rollover accurately. ;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;?;3.Rollover Prediction/Detection;Comment: TTR offers a more direct information for rollover detection. But TTR requires a higher precision(which depends the vehicle model and algorithm) and speed for calculation. ;Conclusion: All of the rollover prediction talked above are model-based. Future work should be focused on fuzzy or neural system to detect rollover which may depend less or not on the vehicle model. ;;4.Rollover Control;4.Rollover Control;4.Rollover Control;4.Rollover Control;Vehicle roll model The design of observer Parameter identification Optimal control ···; Thanks