- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Analysis on Drug Use Practices of CountrysideVillage Medical
Institutions in SHANXI Province
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:The study intended to evaluate the effect of the project’practice and to
provide the theoretical foundation for intervention in Countryside&Village Medical
Institutions of SHANXI Province which ale project areas of HealthⅧproject by surveying the
quality of prescription;The aim was to find out the problem in prescribing depending Oil
investigating the physicians’prescribing behavior.
METHODS:2760 Outpatient prescriptions were random chosen from Countryside&
Village Medical Institutions which are project areas of HealthⅧProject Counties in SHANXI
Province during the period of January to June in 2001 and in 2005,and the information was
collected on a specifically designed form.The calculation of indicators referred to the methods
and standard in《How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities·Selected Drug Use
Indicators},which Was designed by WHO/INRUD.Statistics analysis carried out Excel 2003 and
SPSS 1 1.5 statistical package and statistical methods used t test and Z test et al,
RESULTS:l、the analysis of prescribing on quality:Percentage of prescription
qualification Was 18.5%and OJ3%in 2005 and in 2001.respectively;Among the prescription
head part,textand tail part qualified were 52.4%、26.5%、31.6%in 2005。19.8%、14.7%、
6.0%in 2001.respectively,there Was significant difference between two groups(,O.01).
2、the analysis of prescription indicator:The average number of drugs per encounter in 2005
and in 2001 was 3.0 and 3.8 respectively,there Was significant difference between two groups
(产8.699,PO.001):86.1%and 76.4%ofdrugs were prescribed by generic name in 2005
and in 2001 respectively,there Was significant difference between two groups(z2=128.159,
PO.001):Percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed in 2005 and 2001 Was
47.9%and 67.7%respectively.there Was significant difference between two groups
(Xe=100.223,PO.001):Percentage ofencounters with
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 人教版二年级上册数学全册教学设计(配2025年秋新版教材).docx
- 2024-2025学年北京市东城区高三上学期期末统一检测语文试卷含详解.docx VIP
- 射血分数保留心衰(HFpEF)的临床诊治题库答案-2025年华医网继续教育.docx VIP
- 《景观设计概述》课件.ppt VIP
- 浙江宁波国际投资咨询有限公司招聘笔试题库2025.pdf
- 悬浮床渣油加氢工艺研究.docx VIP
- Unit 1 Letters in Our life(课件)教科版(2024)英语三年级上册.pptx VIP
- 2025云南电网有限责任公司社会招聘9人(第三批)笔试备考题库及答案解析.docx VIP
- 《电子政务协同办公系统电子文件应用与管理技术要求》.doc
- 2024年南京工业职业技术大学单招语文考试试题及答案解析.docx VIP
文档评论(0)