- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
氟哌噻吨美利曲辛联合兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡伴抑郁状态的临床疗效.doc
氟哌噻吨美利曲辛联合兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡伴抑郁状态的临床疗效
【摘要】 目的:分析氟哌噻吨美利曲辛联合兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡伴抑郁状态的临床疗效,并探究其临床适用性。方法:选择2012年2月-2014年5月于本院接受治疗的76例胃溃疡伴抑郁状态患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方案不同,分为研究组和对照组,对照组采用兰索拉唑进行治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上,给予氟哌噻吨美利曲辛进行治疗。观察比较两组HAM-D及HAM-A评分、临床症状总评分、不良反应发生情况及临床疗效。结果:治疗前,治疗前,两组HAM-D及HAM-A评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后1、3、5、7周,研究组HAM-D及HAM-A评分均低于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后,两组临床症状总评分均低于治疗前,且研究组临床症状总评分低于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:氟哌噻吨美利曲辛联合兰索拉唑治疗胃溃疡伴抑郁状态的临床疗效显著,安全可靠,适合临床长期推广应用。
【关键词】 氟哌噻吨美利曲辛; 兰索拉唑; 胃溃疡伴抑郁状态
Clinical Efficacy of Flupenthixol Melitracen Joint Lansoprazole Treatment in Gastric Ulcer with Depression Patients/CHEN Zhi-wei,LIANG Chao-yi,LIANG Chao-ping.//Medical Innovation of China,2016,13(04):065-068
【Abstract】 Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of Flupentixol Melitracen combined with Lansoprazole in the treatment of gastric ulcers associated with depression and to explore its clinical applicability. Method:76 cases of gastric ulcer patients with depression in our hospital from February 2012 to May 2014 were selected as the research objects.According to the treatment plan,they were divided into the study group and the control group.The control group was treated with Lansoprazole,on the basis of the control group,the study group was given Flupenthixol Melitracen.The HAM-D and HAM-A scores,the total score of the clinical symptoms,the incidence of adverse reactions and the clinical efficacy of the two groups were observed and compared.Result:Before treatment,the differences in HAM-D and HAM-A scores of the two groups were not statistically significant(P0.05).1week 3,5,7 weeks after the treatment,the HAM-D and HAM-A scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).After treatment,the total score of the clinical symptoms in the two groups were all lower than those before treatment,the total scores of the clinical symptoms in the study group was lower than that in the control group,the differences were all s
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 信息处理技术员教程(第三版)第10章 计算机网络与互联网.pptx VIP
- [超分子化学与晶体工程基础]-晶体结构分析.pptx VIP
- 《中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2024》解读.pptx VIP
- 中级宏观经济学知到课后答案智慧树章节测试答案2025年春浙江大学.docx VIP
- 2025-2026学年小学科学四年级上册粤教粤科版(2024)教学设计合集.docx
- [超分子化学与晶体工程基础]-超分子化学.pptx VIP
- 2013款上汽通用雪佛兰赛欧_汽车使用手册用户操作图解驾驶指南车主车辆说明书电子版.pdf
- E+H200涡街流量计说明书.pdf VIP
- 20_WD_2021001981_大坝安全监测系统验收规范.pdf VIP
- 信息处理技术员教程(第三版)第9章 数据库应用基础知识.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)