消肿利节方治疗急性创伤性膝关节滑膜炎近期临床疗效观察.docVIP

消肿利节方治疗急性创伤性膝关节滑膜炎近期临床疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
消肿利节方治疗急性创伤性膝关节滑膜炎近期临床疗效观察.doc

消肿利节方治疗急性创伤性膝关节滑膜炎近期临床疗效观察 【摘 要】目的:观察消肿利节方治疗急性创伤性膝关节滑膜炎的近期疗效。方法:将79例膝关节创伤性滑膜炎患者随机分为治疗组41例和对照组38例,治疗组口服消肿利节方,对照组口服双氯芬酸钠。2组均以5 d为1个观察点,15 d为1个疗程,进行疗效评定和观察指标分析。结果:治疗组治愈 22例,好转16例,未愈3例,总有效率为92.68%;对照组治愈17例,好转11例,未愈10例,总有效率为73.68%。2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。2组观察指标比较,重复测量资料采用方差分析得出,疼痛(F 4.91,P 0.03 0.05);肿胀(F 12.92,P 0.01 0.05);功能障碍(F 4.03, P 0.048 0.05)。可认为治疗组与对照组在改善疼痛、肿胀、功能障碍方面有差异,且治疗组改善优于对照组(P 0.05)。结论:消肿利节方在改善疼痛、肿胀、功能障碍方面优于双氯芬酸钠缓释片,近期疗效确切。 【关键词】 创伤性滑膜炎;急性;消肿利节方;膝关节;近期疗效 doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4174.2016.02.003 Clinical Observation on the Short-term Curative Effect of Xiaozhong Lijie Fang (消肿利节方) in the Treatment of Acute Traumatic Synovitis of Knee Joint LIU Bin,GUO Yan-xing,WEN Yong-bing 【ABSTRACT】 Objective:To observe the short-term curative effect of Xiaozhong Lijie Fang(消肿利节方,a prescription for promoting the circulation of blood and relaxing the joints)in the treatment of acute traumatic synovitis of knee joint.Methods:79 cases with acute traumatic synovitis of knee joint were randomly divided into a treatment group (41 cases) and a control group (38 cases).The treatment group was treated with Xiaozhong Lijie Fang,while the control group was orally given diclofenac sodium.The 2 groups were treated for 15 days as a course,and they were observed every 5 days.The curative effect was evaluated and the observation index was analyzed in the two groups.Results:In the treatment group,22 cases were cured,condition of 16 cases was improved,3 cases were not cured,and the total efficiency of was 92.68%;while in the control group,17 cases were cured,condition of 11 cases was improved,10 cases were ineffective,and the total efficiency of was 73.68%.The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P 0.05).Index comparison and analysis of variance to repeated measurement data in the two groups showed pain (F 4.91,P 0.03 0.05),swelling (F 1.292,P 0.01 0.05) and dysfunction (F 4.03,P 0.048 0.05).It can be considered that the tr

文档评论(0)

guan_son + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档