LibraryManagement中国图书馆管理.docVIP

Library Management 中国图书馆管理 Reviewer Comments 审稿意见书 Reviewers: LM attempts to publish articles of the highest order. The Reviewer’s comments ought to be helpful and constructive enabling the author to improve and, if possible, move to publication. You may choose to use this form or respond in freestyle. The headings here are intended as a guide; they are not prescriptive. 审稿人：《中国图书馆管理的文章应建设性使作者, 如果可能,。您可以选择使用或 Thank you for your reviewing work. 非常感谢您的审稿意见。 Title 文章标题: __纸本外刊在馆阅读利用现状及其原因和对策研究__________________________________________ Please rate the paper on the following dimensions and provide detailed comments. Place a Bold √ under your rating. 请详细的评论√ ”。 Not at all完全没有 Somewhat有一些 Completely完全具有 1. Does this paper make a new or substantial contribution to the literature in its own area? 此文 √ Comments: 具体意见： Not at all完全没有 Somewhat有一些 Completely完全具有 2. To what extent would LM readers understand what the authors were trying to accomplish? 《中国图书馆管理读者了解作者 √ Comments: 具体意见： Not at all完全没有 Somewhat有一些 Completely完全具有 3. To what extent would LM readers gain new insights learn new things from reading the paper? 《中国图书馆管理读者获取新 或学新 √ Comments: 具体意见： Not at all完全没有 Somewhat有一些 Completely完全具有 4. How interesting or challenging would LM readers find the ideas in the paper? 对《中国图书馆管理读者本文趣或挑战 √ Comments: 具体意见： Not at all完全没有 Somewhat有一些 Completely完全具有 5. If this is an empirical paper, is the methodology appropriate? 若是有关观察或试验的论文, 其研究方法是适当 √ Comments: Poor/Not Appropriate or not Publishable内容较差/未达到发表水平 Average-Good/ Needs modifications and work平均水平/需要修改 Very Good/ Publishable with little or no work很好/少许修改可发表 6. What is your overall assessment of the paper? 您对本文的综合评估 √ Comments: 具体意见： Overall Recommendation 总体审稿意见 Overall recommendation for including the paper in Library Management. 您对本文图书馆管理 [ ] Be accepted by LM as it stands? 原文接受 [√ ] Be accepted with minor modifications? be specific 修改接受 请具体 见总体意见 [√ ] Be retu