Leeds—Keio人工韧带在膝关节韧带损伤修复中的有效性和安全性研究.docVIP

  • 29
  • 0
  • 约7.73千字
  • 约 10页
  • 2016-12-23 发布于北京
  • 举报

Leeds—Keio人工韧带在膝关节韧带损伤修复中的有效性和安全性研究.doc

Leeds—Keio人工韧带在膝关节韧带损伤修复中的有效性和安全性研究   [摘要] 目的 研究Leeds-Keio人工韧带在膝关节韧带损伤修复中的有效性和安全性。 方法 将2011年1月~2012年12月在长海医院骨科关节病区就诊的膝关节韧带损伤患者纳入研究,采用随机数表法分为Leeds-Keio组和自体移植物组,于术前和术后3、6、9、12、15、18个月时进行Lysholm、Tenger膝关节运动水平评分。 结果 ①术前,两组患者Lysholm膝关节运动水平评分[(43.1±6.3)分比(42.8±7.1)分]、Tenger膝关节运动水平评分[(2.18±0.55)分比(2.21±0.49)分]比较,差异无统计学意义(t = 1.039、0.982,P 0.05);②术后两组患者Lysholm-Tenger膝关节运动水平评分的差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);③Leeds-Keio组:术后3个月起,Lysholm膝关节运动水平评分[(69.9±8.4)分比(43.1±6.3)分]、Tenger膝关节运动水平评分[(4.89±0.67)分比(2.18±0.55)分]均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(t = 5.983、7.763,P 0.05),且术后15个月时评分最高;④自体移植物组:术后6个月起,Lysholm膝关节运动水平评分[(61.4±8.9)分比(42.8±7.1)分]、Tenger膝关节运动水平评分[(4.51±0.62)分比(2.21±0.49)分]均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(t = 5.983、7.763,P 0.05)。结论 Leeds-Keio人工韧带能够更为有效地改善患者的膝关节功能,且在术后15个月时达到最佳的治疗效果。   [关键词] 膝关节损伤;韧带修复;人工韧带;聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯   [中图分类号] R687.4 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-7210(2014)01(c)-0144-04   Effectiveness and safety of Leeds-Keio artificial ligament in the repairment of knee ligament injury   XU Guoxing1,2 XU Guoxin2 KANG Yifan1▲   1.Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; 2.Department of Orthopedics, Binnan Hospital of Petroleum Administration Bureau, Shandong Province, Binzhou 256606, China   [Abstract] Objective To study the effectiveness and safety of Leeds-Keio artificial ligament in the repairment of knee ligament injury. Methods Patients withknee ligament injury in Orthopedics Department of Changhai Hospital from January 2011 to December 2012 were enrolled and divided into Leeds-Keio group and autograft group by random number table method. Then before operation and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 months after operation, Lysholm knee movement level score and Tenger knee movement level score were conducted. Results ①Before operation, there were no statistically significant differences between two groups of Lysholm score and Tenger score [(43.1±6.3) scores vs (42.8±7.1) scores, t = 1.039; (2.18±0.55) scores vs (2.21±0.49) scores, t = 0.982, P 0.05

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档