(优质护理对急诊留观患者的护理满意度和不良情绪的影响分析.docVIP

优质护理对急诊留观患者的护理满意度和不良情绪的影响分析 [摘要]目的：探讨优质对方法到间急诊留观的患者为研究对象，并且依据随机数字法常规组与组，各。常规患者在临床护理的过程中实施常规护理，优质组患者在临床护理的过程中实施护理，两组患者的临床护理满意和不良情绪的变化。结果组临床护理满意度为%，组临床护理满意为%，组常规组（＜）前组组的SAS评分和SDS评分比较无明显的差异（＞）无意义；护理后优质组与组SAS评分和SDS评分较护理前有明显的改善，且优质组优于常规组（＜）差异有统计学意义。组事件发生率、护理投诉率护理文书时间低于常规组（＜）优质组医师认同度明显的高于常规组（＜）统计学有意义。：临床中对于急诊留院观察患者实施优质护理效果明显，能够较好的提高患者的临床护理满意度，并且改善其不良情绪，值得临床中应用与推广。 优质护理；护理满意度；不良情绪 Analysis of the impact of high quality of nursing in emergency nursing satisfaction of patients and bad mood [abstract] objective: To investigate the effect of high quality of nursing in emergency nursing satisfaction of patients and bad mood.Methods: between January 2013 to June 2014, 120 cases of emergency department patients under observation as the research object, and on the basis of random number table method is divided into normal group and the high quality, 60 cases each. Routine group in the process of clinical nursing in patients with routine nursing, high-quality group of patients in clinical care in the process of implementation of quality care, observation of two groups of patients with clinical nursing satisfaction and the change of the bad feelings. Results: clinical nursing satisfaction quality group was 95.0%, the regular set of clinical nursing satisfaction was 71.7%, the quality is higher than conventional group (P 0.05). Nursing before the normal group and the high quality of SAS scores and SDS score is no obvious difference (P 0.05), statistically insignificant; After nursing quality group and routine group SAS scores and SDS score than before treatment significantly improved, and high quality group is superior to the conventional group (P 0.05), the difference was statistically significant. High quality group and incidence of adverse events, nursing complaints and nursing documents writing time are lower than normal group (P 0.05); High-quality doctors were obvious higher than the conventional group (P 0.05), statistically significant. Conclusions: In clinical practic