(翻译理论与实践期末试卷.docxVIP

英语原文：Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and applications（Chapter 11）翻译研究前言：理论与应用（11章）11.4 The future: co-operation or fragmentation?未来:合作或分裂?Translation studies is therefore already functioning, to borrow McCartys term, at the interstices of existing fields and is developing a new interdisciplinary character. 在现有领域中，翻译研究借助麦克凯帝的术语，早就发挥了重要的作用。现在，翻译研究朝着一个跨学科的新方向发展。The question is how far this is a strength or a weakness for the field as a whole.问题是跨学科发展对于整个翻译研究领域是有利的还是有弊的呢？它的作业有多大？ Each of its subject areas is competing for prime position, with perhaps the most evident split being that between linguists and cultural theorists (see Baker 1997b: 277-80, Venuti 1998: 7-8).在跨学科翻译研究中，每个学科想获得最好的地位而相互竞争。在语言学家和文化理论家之间的竞争最为激烈，这也导致语言学科和文化学科之间的分裂也更明显。（见贝克1997b：277-80，韦努蒂1998：7-8）。 The former dominated in the 1950s and 1960s, while in the last decade linguistic theories have been marginalized by scholars moving within, or adopting the practices of, other disciplines. 在20世纪50年代和60年代的之间语言学科一直处于上风，但在过去的十年中，语言学理论一直被学术界的学者们所排斥，或是采用其他学科的做法。Some translation scholars, among them Bassnett and Lefevere (1990), have been scathingly dismissive of those working in linguistics. 一些翻译学者，其中包括巴斯奈特和勒费维尔（1990），被语言学工作者毫不留情地鄙视。Given the range of interests and frictions represented in translation studies, 在翻译研究中，依据各个学科之间的利益和冲突关系，one must wonder whether there might at some point not be a total fragmentation of the discipline and either a separation of the different strands or a consolidation of the previous disciplinary separation(modern languages, cultural studies, linguistics, etc.). 有人一定会发出疑问，是否在某种程度上可存在学科与学科之间共通的点，是否有完全独立于其他学科的部分，是否能合并之前分离学科的共同点。（现代语言，文化研究，语言学等。）A key question for contemporary researchers, faced with the proliferation of current work in translation studies, is how far they should specialize. 而在当代研究中的关键问题是面对着日益增长的翻译工作，翻译人员专业化水平应该达到怎样的高度。What may be needed in the future is some greater degree of specialization and more collaboration on joint projects. 未来可能需要更高程度的专业化和在联合项目中的更强的合作