Contrastive analysis of prefix dis- and un- in English.docVIP

Contrastive analysis of prefix dis- and un- in English.doc

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Contrastive analysis of prefix dis- and un- in English.doc

Contrastive analysis of prefix dis- and un- in English   Abstract. English prefix dis- and un- are commonly surveyed along with some other negative prefixes. However, there are many cases in which prefix dis- and un- can be attached to the same root, causing the difficulty in distinguishing the comprehension of the two prefixes’ semantic roles. Considering this issue, this paper endeavors to clarify the respective morphological processes and explain their specific semantic roles.   Keywords: dis-; un-; morphological process, semantic role   1. Introduction   Previous researches on dis- and un- are mostly conducted in the terms of their negative function as such: He (2004) discussed three combination rules of prefix and the root: the same origin rule between the prefix and the root, the assimilation rule and the category collocation rule, of which prefix dis- and un belong to the first rule; He (1999) mainly discussed the development of un- usage since post-War I, indicating the flexibility of function in prefix un-; Guo (2012) introduced the meanings of prefix un-、in-、dis- with many examples, which is more detailed illustrated in Yang (2010); Wang (1998) came up with many examples of same root prefixed with both dis- and un-, directly leading to the theme of recognition of their semantic roles. With the help of these previous journals and Du (2009) as the academic references, this paper aims at clarifying the usage of the two prefix with enough examples and deepening the analysis thoroughly in the point view of semantics and syntactic.   2. etymology difference   As Du (2009) points out, prefix dis- belongs to Latin prefix with the meaning of 揳part, asunder, away, in different direction?such as words: dispel, disperse. According to the same origeein rule between the prefix and the root, its Latin origin determines dis- to be attached to Latin roots. Literally, dis- is more prefixed before French roots, which as a matter of fact confirms this same0origin ru

文档评论(0)

guan_son + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档