GRE作文常误见区总结.docVIP

GRE作文常见误区总结 $ [7 F, O; Y8 I, g4 f+ w! J n; [6 I# R9 ` b; v7 ]5 c; t- `% O( l当版主这大半年，改过的作文也算是不少了，给我的一个很深的感受就是，好的文章总是有共同的优点，而不好的文章总是会有各种各样的缺陷。甚至很多文章陷入了误区。下面就来看看这些缺陷和误区吧。3 R: P, P6 O9 y ~* \ L9 N: [3 \刚开始AW，大部分人总归是有一些恐惧感的，毕竟从四六级的100字作文到AW的500数量级，这个飞跃在心理上确实是一个大跨越。就算是考过T的人在篇幅上也会有点小小的不适应。然而很多人在看了3分范文之后信心满满，觉得自己的issue至少可以到4分甚至5分。更有很多3.5分的人在自己的成绩出来之后跟范文对比觉得自己的issue肯定比3分或者是4分写的要好。于是开始质疑ETS评分标准的改变。然而真的是这样吗？) L: W3 m. u% g9 ?2 T2 W) o1 @2 L) }/ s y) x很多人会去分析5分，6分的范文，并努力从中学到高分的精华。但是面对每次出分大批大批（超过一半）的3分issue，从来很少人会去想，我们的作文缺乏什么，走入了哪些误区呢？现在我就从3分和4分的两篇官方范文为材料，解读这些误区。 e9 J/ H% `$ e3 {! c# V* O# Q5 B5 e {1 d( c下面我们看一下ETS给的官方范文1 A8 l( z??z7 t+ N7 m8 J9 g! p/ l. D: H( ], w- wSample Issue Topic ??]??q6 u _/ s4 T/ y9 {In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives. . t# w# r( {6 `8 F( X1 T# n; k: q) [ I( u3 X/ o: JBenchmark 3 6 x) q5 Q1 ]8 ~5 h, q3 A: PGeneralists have the ideas and beliefs of what America is made of. Americas wealth of knowledge can be related to the generalists of the past generations and the original leaders of our Constitution Period that helped shape our great nation. If our former leaders would have not been generalists when creating our countrys Constitution in the late 1770s, American generations of would have been burdened with the constant understanding that they are doomed to failure. / T* k0 S; w2 a: cThe fact that our past leaders were not specialists gave the creation of the Constitution the ability to be changed through amendments passed by our represented leaders of today. The Constitution was created with the ability to adapt to the countries needs and demands in running our society as it changes over time. The generalists approach to this creation of a non-specialized Constitution shows the need for todays generations to continue with the beliefs that a specialist would not follow. ( }0 Y l: k7 ~, V; F# ]+ ]9 J; [) kAmerica has learned from its past and ha