Degradation of Piloting Skills Chi Siamo我们是谁piloting降解技巧学院.pptVIP

The next statement asked pilots if they felt confident flying by raw data alone. The results indicated that pilots strongly agreed with this statement only 13% of the time with 60% stating that they somewhat agreed. A total of 26% of the pilots somewhat disagreed with the statement. These responses indicate that a majority of pilots (86%) have some reservations about flying solely by raw data as indicated by the lack of “strongly agree” responses. In response to the statement “I could fly a takeoff, V1 cut, ILS, and a missed approach using only raw data,” 53% of pilots strongly agreed and 47% somewhat agreed This indicates that the pilots believed that they could fly these maneuvers although not perfectly as indicated by the somewhat agree response. There were no pilots who disagreed with the statement. Pilots were asked if they believe that their basic instrument skills have declined over time . Pilots agreed with this statement 26% of the time and somewhat agreed 53% of the time. Only one pilot strongly disagreed with the statement, however 16% of the pilots somewhat disagreed with the statement. This indicates that a majority of the pilots feel that their skills have somewhat diminished over time. The final survey statement asked whether pilots believed that their company encourages hand flying. This statement saw a wide range of opinions. It is the author’s experience and anecdotal opinion that companies who encourage hand flying generally have pilots who choose to hand fly more often. Pilots agreed with this statement 20% of the time and somewhat agreed 57% of the time. Pilots somewhat disagreed 16% of the time and strongly disagreed 7% of the time. * Actual test results from the study. Note that the [Sig} column of this graph indicates that there were no statistical differences between narrow-body and wide body pilots. In order to be considered significant the results would equal or less that .05. A final set of analyses were computed to te