Norfolk State and LHC COSM at Hampton University诺福克州立和LHC在汉普顿大学的COSM.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约2.24千字
约 12页
2017-03-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Norfolk State and LHC COSM at Hampton University诺福克州立和LHC在汉普顿大学的COSM.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Norfolk State and LHC COSM at Hampton University诺福克州立和LHC在汉普顿大学的COSM

Hampton U ATLAS-TRT project Barrel TRT Straw Wire Support Assembly and Insertion K. McFarlane Hampton University DOE/NSF Review, BNL March 2001 Wire Support Steps Clean parts Assemble parts with epoxy Inspect a sample Insert CWS in rough-cut straw, gluing in place with epoxy Inspect position and adhesion after curing Inspect interior of final-cut straw. Ultem Part Cleaning Wire Support Assembly Center Wire Support Insertion CWS gluing method A drop of epoxy is dispensed in the center of a 1480mm straw The CWS is then pushed down the straw, over the drop. Problems (1) At the beginning of production, it often happened that the drop was not dispensed, so the process was adjusted to ensure dispensing Problems were found in October, 2000 by Duke, coincidentally with our switching to a new batch of epoxy with less viscosity. There were glue spots in the straw, often very many CWS insertion was shut down for several weeks while the problem was studied and adjustments made. Problems (2) Rejection was high, running above 50% for some batches About 700 straws were lost due to excessive glue As a result, a full interior inspection begun, using an angioscope. Comparison of Interiors Changes The problem seems to arise from an interaction between glue viscosity, pressure and vacuum in the dispenser, and electrostatic forces between the glue and the straw. Changes were made in straw tip shape and spacing from the straw, pressure and vacuum used in dispensing, and the gluing fixture With rejection rates on interior inspection about 1%, the problem is being controlled More interiors Conclusions Rejection rate is still high (~1%) Work will continue to be done to reduce this rate through changes in the process May require additional changes, including changing to inserting the CWS first; this will result in more glue in the straw at the wire joint side. This would affect the physics K. McFarlane BNL, 20-Mar to 22-Mar, 2001 Hampton U ATLAS-TRT project We use a water-based ultra-son