Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory’ DCU Home没有什么实际的作为一个好的理论的DCU的家.pptVIP

Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory’ DCU Home没有什么实际的作为一个好的理论的DCU的家.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory’ DCU Home没有什么实际的作为一个好的理论的DCU的家

‘Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory’ RAY PAWSON r.d.pawson@leeds.ac.uk The Talk’s Tasks Some new roles for theory in evidence based policy Systematic Review Knowledge Transfer Dealing with Complexity Rival approaches to systematic review Megan’s Law - Programme Theory Evidence fragment one: could the law have made a difference? - a ‘prospective simulation’ Evidence fragment two: did the law effect recidivism? A matched trial Evidence fragment three: how did practitioners respond? Office talk Megan’s Law - an emerging theory Opportunity for and effectiveness of surveillance by the community is low. Increased surveillance and control by law enforcement - though this might lead to detection rather than deterrence. On the shoulders of giants? Are evaluation’s lessons transferable? Can we recycle evaluation findings? But would it work in my patch? Replication and the search for enduring empirical generalisation OR Comparison and the confederation of of diverse findings under ‘theory’ “THE GENERIC TOOLS OF GOVERNMENT ACTION” Rather than focusing on individual programs, as is now done, or even collections of programs grouped according to major ‘purpose’ as is frequently proposed, the suggestion here is that we should concentrate on the generic tools of government action that come to be used, in varying combinations in particular public programs. Carrot theory - a Cook’s Tour How Incentives Fare: New York Tenements Early 20th C USA - Erewon State University Campus Late 20th C Breakfast Room Domesticville, Canada Late 20th C Earmarking ‘death money’ A significant proportion of charitable poor relief, intended for basic nutrition and child welfare, was paid over as ‘death money’ to be used for the extravagant funerals of family members. The neighbours would talk if their wasn’t a “fine layout”. Earmarking ‘blood money’ “I kind of considered it like getting twenty bucks from grandmother. It’s 20 free dollars…. Your going to go blow it on something…. I never rea

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

118books + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档