Pretrial Procedures Southeast Missouri State University审前程序东南密苏里州立大学.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约6.52千字
约 30页
2017-03-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Pretrial Procedures Southeast Missouri State University审前程序东南密苏里州立大学.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Pretrial Procedures Southeast Missouri State University审前程序东南密苏里州立大学

Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion Petition and pretrial release Bail and preventive detention Plea bargaining (adjustment) Transfer to adult court Transfer, waiver, bindover, removal Concurrent jurisdiction Excluded offenses (traffic, serious) Number of excluded offenses has increased Judicial waiver to adult court Kent v. U.S. Waived to adult court, despite requests for a psychiatric evaluation, access to social service file, motions for a hearing Found guilty in adult court for housebreaking and robbery, not guilty by reason of insanity for rape Kent v U.S. (1966) Court ruled that cases of waiver required: A hearing Access to counsel and access by counsel to social service records Reason for the decision Criteria to be considered Seriousness of offense Aggressive or violent Maturity of juvenile Record of the juvenile Public protection Potential for rehabilitation Breed v. Jones Petition filed and he was adjudicated Found unfit for juvenile court at disposition hearing Transferred to adult court Found guilty U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was double jeopardy (5th amendment Transfer hearings Full hearing Notice Right to counsel Statement for reasons Debate over transfer Get tough vs. rehabilitation 1% now transferred (drugs most common) Cases waived increased in early 1990s, number has now been decreasing Debate Waivers do not necessarily increase public protection; result may be the same in both juvenile and adult court In one study., only 3% of juveniles tried in adult court received longer sentences than they would have received in juvenile court (1996) Debate However, in another study those waived to adult court received significantly greater sentences than those retained in juvenile court (1986) Another problem is that transfers might be motivated by political considerations rather than the case Debate One study found that juveniles transferred to adult court no more dangerous than those retained Transfer decisions not