- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
老年人不稳定型转子间骨折的两种手术方式比较.doc
老年人不稳定型转子间骨折的两种手术方式比较
[摘要] 目的 比较股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)与股骨近端锁定加压钢板(PF-LCP)治疗老年不稳定型转子间骨折的疗效。 方法 选取武汉大学人民医院骨科2010年11月~2012年12月期间收治的60例股骨转子间骨折患者,根据患者接受的手术方法,分成PFNA组和PF-LCP组,每组各30例。观察两组的手术指标(手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度)、术后负重时间、骨折愈合的时间、髋关节功能评分、术后并发症进行比较。 结果 PFNA组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度均优于PF-LCP组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 对于老年不稳定性股骨转子间骨折患者,股骨近端抗旋髓内钉固定治疗股骨近端转子间骨折可以有效减少患者术后的并发症,减少了患者的痛苦,改善患者预后,更有利于患者术后功能恢复,值得临床应用及推广使用。
[关键词] 不稳定;转子间骨折;髓内钉;锁定加压
[中图分类号] R274.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)10(a)-0036-04
Comparision of two operation methods of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in elder patients
YANG Hui QIU Bo
Department of Orthopaedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Province, Wuhan 430060, China;
[Abstract] Objective To compare efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with proximal femoral locking compression plate (PF-LCP) for elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 60 patients with intertrochanteric fracture in Department of Orthopaedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from November 2010 to December 2012 were divided into two groups: proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) group and proximal femoral locking compression plate (PF-LCP) group depending on surgical approaches. Surgical indicators (operative time, blood loss, length of incision) were observed. Besides, other posteroperative indicators, such as postoperative weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, hip score and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results Operative time, blood loss, length of incision of patients in PFNA group were superior to those of patients in PF-LCP group and the differences were all statistically significant (P 0.05); load days, fracture healing time of patients in PFNA group were better than those of patients in PF-LCP group and the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); Patients in PFNA group achieved higher postoperative Harris score than the PF-LCP group. Conclusion For senile u
文档评论(0)