When contact counts Intergroup contact on business and intermarriage resistance in the Caucasus region.pdfVIP
- 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
When contact counts Intergroup contact on business and intermarriage resistance in the Caucasus region.pdf
Social Science Research 63 (2017) 308e323
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Social Science Research
journal homepage: /locate/ssresearch
When contact counts: Intergroup contact on business and intermarriage resistance in the Caucasus region
Benjamin T. Gurrentz a, *, Roger Finke b
a Department of Sociology Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA b Department of Sociology Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, 402 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA
article info
Article history: Received 3 September 2015 Received in revised form 24 August 2016 Accepted 21 September 2016 Available online 22 September 2016
Keywords: Intergroup contact Con?ict Social psychology Religion International
abstract
Intergroup contact theory has been empirically supported in a variety of social contexts, but few samples have been drawn from rapidly developing nations undergoing severe political and sociocultural con?ict. Using 2012 Caucasus Barometer data from the three nations of the South Caucasus d Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia d we test the effect of interreligious contact on various forms of out-group resistance in a region of the world that is both historically and presently marked with severe religious and ethnic con?ict. Additionally, we take into account self-selection effects using propensity score matching. Results overwhelmingly support intergroup contact theory in all three countries, but objections toward intermarriage still remain high for treated groups. In addition, there exist signi?cant differences based on the out-group studied, with the contact effects being the strongest for groups posing little religio-cultural or organized threat. Weaker contact effects, though, appear less related to threat and more contextual/out-group speci?c.
? 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
One of the most enduring social scienti?c explanations for reducing intergroup prejudice is some form of intergroup
您可能关注的文档
- Time Series Analysis of the in class Page View History of Digital Teaching Materials using Cross Table.pdf
- Time-fractional heat transfer equations in modeling of the non-contacting face seals.pdf
- TiNiAu contacts to n-SiC after low energy implantation.pdf
- To eat or not to eat Effects of food availability on reward system activity during food picture viewing.pdf
- To treat...or not to treat Clinicians’ views on the management of oral potentially malignant disorders.pdf
- To use or not to use the goto statement Programming styles viewed from Hoare Logic.pdf
- TOEFL阅读词汇题合集.doc
- Top-emission organic light emitting diodes with lower viewing angle dependence.pdf
- Topic Driven Multimodal Similarity Learning with Multi-view Voted Convolutional Features.pdf
- Topographic Variations in Normal Skin, as Viewed by In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy.pdf
文档评论(0)