Again a comparison of two procedures of cesarean section.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 13 Again a comparison of two procedures of cesarean section 【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the two kinds of cesarean section on the impact of cesarean section again, with a view to improve the existing surgical, reduce or mitigate the occurrence of complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis of past with modern and traditional history of lower uterine segment cesarean section compared to patients due to a re-re-pregnant at the undergraduate total of 152 cases of cesarean section. Results: The new and traditional cesarean section cesarean section cesarean section again, no significant difference in body temperature, Pgt; 0.05. Abdominal surgery time, blood loss, abdominal wall adhesion layers was higher than the observation group, P lt;0.05. However, the observation group the total operation time, hospitalization time, the incidence of wound complications compared with the control group, P lt;0.05. Conclusion: The new lower uterine segment cesarean section with traditional cesarean section compared with cesarean section adhesions caused by the more traditional serious lower uterine segment cesarean section, increasing the difficulty of surgery, gynecological surgery once again increased the difficulty of the choice of incision, but the abdomen incision cesarean section than the traditional lower uterine segment cesarean section with few complications. Keywords: cesarean section cesarean section adhesions again Cesarean section is the new star of Israel in 1988, under a doctor right lower uterine segment transverse incision cesarean section be improved [1], using the abdominal joel-cohen methods and unique style of abdominal closure, so that cesarean section has made a short time, less bleeding, less damage, the good effects of rapid postoperative recovery, and soon all over the world to promote. In our hospital since the end of 1997 to carry out cesarean section has been welcomed by the majority of patients